A previously well 15-year-old male presented with a history of gross rectal prolapse (GRP) involving full-thickness rectal prolapse of increasing severity and incidence over 6 months that occurred with every bowel motion, varying from 10 to 40 cm. He denied constipation and passed a soft motion once daily, adeptly reducing his prolapsed rectum after each motion. This case illustrates technical challenges and planning for surgical intervention for optimal treatment in keeping with an FDA alert issued April, 2019 banning surgical mesh for pelvic organ prolapse. Preoperative fluoroscopic defecography confirmed rectal prolapse beginning with eversion of the anal verge identified on inspection. For surgery, general anesthesia was induced, he was placed in a Trendelenburg position, and four ports were inserted. The peritoneum was incised and blunt dissection used to expose the levator ani complex (LAC) taking care to prevent lateral nerve injury and preserve regional vascularity. Seven polypropylene sutures were used to fix the seromuscular posterior wall of the rectum to the median raphe of the LAC, the presacral fascia, and the periosteum of the sacral promontory. Operative time was 170 min. Postoperative recovery and progress were unremarkable. Currently, 5 years postoperatively, defecation is regular without recurrence of prolapse. For prolapse involving protrusion of the upper rectum without eversion of the anal verge, rectal fixation to the sacral promontory without further dissection beyond the peritoneal reflection is adequate, but when extensive prolapse is associated with eversion of the anal verge, more extensive blunt dissection from the peritoneal reflection to the LAC with multiple rectopexy sutures is valid for reducing risks for recurrence and eliminating mesh-related complications.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9433537PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2022.900081DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

rectal prolapse
16
eversion anal
12
anal verge
12
prolapse
8
blunt dissection
8
sacral promontory
8
dissection peritoneal
8
peritoneal reflection
8
rectal
5
case report
4

Similar Publications

In the absence of preexisting conditions, rectal prolapse is rarely seen in children older than four years old. This case report presents a peculiar instance involving a previously healthy five-year-old female who presented to the clinic with her parents due to a three-day history of constipation, hard stools, and painful defecation. Physical examination revealed a rectal prolapse.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: To describe our experience with anorectal malformation (ARM) patients, while analyzing complications and risk factors.

Materials And Methods: A retrospective study of ARM patients aged 0-18 years old undergoing surgery from 2006 to 2023 was carried out. Demographic variables, associated malformations, age and repair surgery operating times, presence and type of colostomy, previous intestinal preparation, and presence and type of surgical complications -intestinal occlusion, anal prolapse, stenosis, bleeding, dehiscence, extrusion, anoplasty misposition, urethral perforation, and stomal complications- were collected.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Phenotypes of Pelvic Organ Prolapse.

Urogynecology (Phila)

January 2025

From the Division of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA.

Importance: The Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) stages do not correlate with symptoms or characterize important prolapse subtypes.

Objectives: We hypothesize that clinically meaningful prolapse "phenotypes" utilizing POP-Q measurements can be defined. The primary aim was to define the phenotypes and their frequency.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

A novel modification of the cutback procedure, a posterior rectal advancement anoplasty (PRAA) for select male patients with an anorectal malformation and a rectoperineal fistula was recently described which incised only within the limits of the sphincteric ellipse and eliminated an anterior rectal dissection, thus avoiding any possibility of a urethral injury. This report provides longer term postoperative outcomes after PRAA. Method A retrospective, single institution study was performed examining male patients with a rectoperineal fistula between 1/2020-12/2023.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!