Misinformation? Disinformation?

J Oral Maxillofac Surg

Guest Editorial.

Published: September 2022

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2022.06.009DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

misinformation? disinformation?
4
misinformation?
1

Similar Publications

Background: The spread of fake news may lead to a disparate wave of digital health-seeking behavior, cyberchondria, anxiety, indecision, and other psychosocial dysfunctions, including collapse in social capital and stigmatization. In this study, we utilized a bibliometric analysis to discern the primary trends associated with health communication and health-seeking behavior regarding dementia-related contents in countries within the Middle East and North African (MENA) region.

Method: A literature review was conducted in November 2023.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Vaccination uptake is influenced by many cues during health information seeking online.

Health Info Libr J

January 2025

Department of Management Information Systems, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

Background: Much government response to improving vaccination uptake during the COVID-19 pandemic has focused on the problems of misinformation and disinformation. There may, however, be other signals within online health information that influence uptake of vaccination.

Objective: This study identified the influence of various health information signals within online information communities on the intention of receiving the vaccine.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Misinformation, under-information, and disinformation regarding HIV among adolescents may be associated with a high prevalence of HIV among adolescents and young adults. The source of the HIV-related knowledge determines the accuracy and comprehensiveness of the information received. This study aimed to assess the adequacy (accuracy and comprehensive) of HIV-related knowledge and its determinants among senior school students in Abakaliki.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

A thematic analysis of UK COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy discussions on Twitter.

BMC Public Health

January 2025

Department of Applied Health Sciences and Institute for Mental Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.

Background: Following UK approval of the Pfizer-BioNTech and Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccines on 2/12/20 and 30/12/20 respectively, discussions about them emerged on the social media platform Twitter, (now 'X'). Previous research has shown that Twitter/ X is used by the UK public to engage with public health announcements and that social media influences public opinions of vaccines, including COVID-19 vaccines, globally. This study explored discussions on Twitter posted in response to the UK government's posts introducing the Pfizer-BioNTech and Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccines.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The purpose of this scoping review is to identify the models of Health Information Disorders (HIDs), the components of these models, their study setting, and their designing approaches.

Materials And Methods: In this study, PubMed, Web Of Science (WOS), Scopus, ProQuest, and Embase databases were searched to identify relevant articles. After screening the identified studies, 22 studies were selected.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!