Background: The Betel Nut Intervention Trial (BENIT) is the first known randomized controlled intervention trial designed to help minority Pacific Islanders in Guam and Saipan quit chewing the carcinogenic Areca catechu nut (AN). We report the BENIT's saliva bioverification results against the self-reported chewing status ("quitter" or "chewer") at day 22 follow-up.
Material And Methods: AN-specific (arecoline, arecaidine, guvacoline, and guvacine) and tobacco-specific (nicotine, cotinine, and hydroxycotinine) alkaloids were analyzed in saliva from 176 BENIT participants by an established and sensitive liquid chromatography mass spectrometry-based assay.
Results: The combined four AN alkaloid levels decreased from baseline in quitters (n = 50) and chewers (n = 108) by 32% and 9%, respectively. In quitters, decreases were significant for arecoline (p = 0.044)-the most prominent AN alkaloid, along with arecaidine (p = 0.042) and nicotine (p = 0.011). In chewers, decreases were significant only for hydroxycotinine (p = 0.004). Similar results were obtained when quitters and chewers were stratified by treatment arm.
Discussion: Salivary AN alkaloid levels generally agreed with self-reported chewing status, which suggests the former can be used to verify the latter.
Conclusion: Our results can help to objectively evaluate compliance and program effectiveness in AN cessation programs.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9870849 | PMC |
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/dta.3364 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Pivotal trial characteristics and types of endpoints used to support Food and Drug Administration rare disease drug approvals between 2013 and 2022.
Clin Trials
January 2025
Rare Diseases Team, Office of New Drugs, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA.
Background/aims: Rare disease drug development faces unique challenges, such as genotypic and phenotypic heterogeneity within small patient populations and a lack of established outcome measures for conditions without previously successful drug development programs. These challenges complicate the process of selecting the appropriate trial endpoints and conducting clinical trials in rare diseases. In this descriptive study, we examined novel drug approvals for non-oncologic rare diseases by the U.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAdaptive promising zone design for sequential parallel comparison design with continuous outcomes.
Clin Trials
January 2025
Department of Biostatistics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Introduction: The sequential parallel comparison design has emerged as a valuable tool in clinical trials with high placebo response rates. To further enhance its efficiency and effectiveness, adaptive strategies, such as sample size adjustment and allocation ratio modification can be employed.
Methods: We compared the performance of Jennison and Turnbull's method and the Promising Zone approach for sample size adjustment in a two-phase sequential parallel comparison design study.
Background/aims: Certain sociodemographic groups are routinely underrepresented in clinical trials, limiting generalisability. Here, we describe the extent to which enriched enrolment approaches yielded a diverse trial population enriched for older age in a randomised controlled trial of a blood-based multi-cancer early detection test (NCT05611632).
Methods: Participants aged 50-77 years were recruited from eight Cancer Alliance regions in England.
Self-reported health status of patients with acute retinal ischemia and stroke related hemianopia.
Eur Stroke J
January 2025
Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Background: We aimed to assess impairments on health-related quality of life, and mental health resulting from Retinal artery occlusion (RAO) with monocular visual field loss and posterior circulation ischemic stroke (PCIS) with full or partial hemianopia using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).
Methods: In a prospective study, consecutive patients with acute RAO on fundoscopy and PCIS on imaging were recruited during their surveillance on a stroke unit over a period of 15 months. Baseline characteristics were determined from medical records and interviews.
Design and early progress of the Comparison of Anticoagulation and anti-Platelet Therapies for Intracranial Vascular Atherostenosis (CAPTIVA) trial.
Int J Stroke
January 2025
Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Background: The usual antithrombotic treatment for symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS) consists of dual treatment with clopidogrel and aspirin for 90 days followed by aspirin alone but the risk of recurrent stroke remains high up to 12 months. The Comparison of Anticoagulation and anti-Platelet Therapies for Intracranial Vascular Atherostenosis (CAPTIVA) trial was designed to determine whether other combinations of dual antithrombotic therapy are superior to clopidogrel and aspirin.
Methods: CAPTIVA is an ongoing, prospective, double-blinded, three-arm clinical trial at over 100 sites in the United States and Canada that will randomize 1683 high-risk subjects with a symptomatic infarct attributed to 70-99% stenosis of a major intracranial artery to 12 months of treatment with (1) ticagrelor (180 mg loading dose, then 90 mg twice daily), (2) low-dose rivaroxaban (2.
Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!