Accuracy of Attestation Among Micrographic Dermatologic Surgery Diplomates.

JAMA Netw Open

Center for Quantitative Health and Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

Published: September 2022

This quality improvement study examines the standards of certification by the American Board of Dermatology for performance of micrographic dermatologic surgery.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9440403PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.29795DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

micrographic dermatologic
8
dermatologic surgery
8
accuracy attestation
4
attestation micrographic
4
surgery diplomates
4
diplomates quality
4
quality improvement
4
improvement study
4
study examines
4
examines standards
4

Similar Publications

Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) is a tissue-sparing skin cancer resection technique that involves 100% margin analysis. This procedure is performed in the outpatient setting under local anesthesia by dermatologic surgeons who act as both the surgeon and the pathologist. The technique allows for prompt reconstruction immediately after cancer clearance and offers the highest cure rate for many skin malignancies, including basal and squamous cell carcinoma, as well as more rare tumors.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: In dermatology, the majority of opioid prescriptions occur in dermatologic surgery. Even short courses of opioids are linked to substance abuse. Reported rates of opioid prescription in dermatologic surgery are variable, with no consensus on when they should be prescribed.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Exploring opposing arguments in the call for randomized controlled trials to demonstrate benefit of Mohs micrographic surgery for cutaneous melanoma.

Dermatol Online J

October 2024

Department of Dermatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA Division of Dermatologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.

The call for robust randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) with wide local excision for treatment of melanoma has stymied the development of guidelines for MMS despite growing evidence of benefit. This commentary explores the controversy by detailing opposing arguments, reviewing the relevant evidence supporting the use of MMS for early-stage melanoma, and discussing the role that RCTs may play in development of national guidelines for surgical treatment options for melanoma. Randomized clinical trials are considered the gold standard of clinical research, but there are no such trials currently to support MMS for melanoma.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!