Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asjsur.2022.07.143 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Incidence of Incisional Hernias after Single-Port Versus Multi-Port Robotic Radical Prostatectomy.
J Endourol
November 2024
Department of Urology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
Article Synopsis
- A study aimed to compare incisional hernia rates between single-port (SP-RARP) and multi-port robotic-assisted radical prostatectomies (MP-RARP) using data from 493 patients over five years.*
- The overall hernia rate was found to be similar between the two techniques (8.1% for SP-RARP vs. 9.2% for MP-RARP), but SP-RARP had quicker operating room times (236 minutes vs. 276 minutes).*
- However, patients undergoing SP-RARP were 3.4 times more likely to develop hernias compared to those with MP-RARP, with higher BMI and previous abdominal surgeries being significant risk factors.*
Single-port robotic versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with BMI ≥ 25 kg/m: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
J Robot Surg
November 2024
Department of Basic and Clinical Sciences, University of Nicosia Medical School, 21 Ilia Papakyriakou, 2414 Engomi, P.O. Box 24005, 1700, Nicosia, Cyprus.
Previous studies have compared single-port robotic cholecystectomy (SPRC) to single-incision laparoscopic (SILC). However, there is not a systematic review and meta-analysis in patient with BMI ≥ 25 kg/m even though higher BMI is a risk factor for gallstone disease, a common indication for cholecystectomy. PubMed, Scopus and Cochrane Library were searched for related literature.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFThree-year follow-up outcomes of postoperative quality of life from a randomized controlled trial comparing multi-port versus single-port laparoscopic distal gastrectomy.
Surg Endosc
January 2025
Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences and Medical School, Aichi, Japan.
Background: Laparoscopic surgery for gastric cancer has become widely used; minimally invasive surgery has become the mainstream of treatment. This randomized controlled trial (RCT) aimed to compare long-term quality of life (QoL) and weight loss rates in patients who underwent single-port laparoscopic gastrectomy (SLG) or multi-port laparoscopic gastrectomy (MLG) for gastric cancer.
Methods: This single-center RCT compared MLG and SLG in patients with clinical stage I gastric cancer, all of which underwent distal gastrectomy between April 2016 and September 2018.
Article Synopsis
- * Three studies involving 346 patients were analyzed, finding no significant differences in overall morbidity, hospital stay, or complications between the two surgical methods.
- * The robotic approach did yield a higher number of lymph nodes in cancer cases, indicating possible oncological advantages, but more extensive trials are needed to evaluate their costs and broader implications.
Single-Port Versus Reduced-Port (1 + 1) Robotic Myomectomy and Hysterectomy.
J Clin Med
October 2024
Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 222 Banpo-daero, Seocho-gu, Seoul 06591, Republic of Korea.
Article Synopsis
- The study compared reduced-port (RP) robotic surgery to single-port (SP) robotic surgery by analyzing outcomes from 184 patients who underwent either myomectomy or hysterectomy.
- Results showed that RP robotic surgery was effective, with more leiomyomas removed in the RP robotic myomectomy (RP-RM) group compared to the SP-RM group.
- Overall, RP robotic surgery was found to be a feasible alternative to SP surgery, with shorter operating times for RP robotic hysterectomy (RP-RH) compared to SP robotic hysterectomy (SP-RH).
Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!