AI Article Synopsis

  • A systematic review was conducted to evaluate the effects of preserving the C1 anterior arch during odontoidectomy on spine stability and post-treatment outcomes in patients with ventral brainstem compression.
  • The analysis included 27 studies with 462 patients, showing a significant reduction in spine instability when the C1 anterior arch was preserved, along with overall positive clinical improvement in 78.8% of cases.
  • The results indicated that both transoral approaches (TOA) and endoscopic endonasal approaches (EEA) yield similar outcomes, although EEA was associated with higher intraoperative cerebrospinal fluid leaks.

Article Abstract

Background: Odontoidectomy for symptomatic irreducible ventral brainstem compression at the craniovertebral junction may result in spine instability requiring subsequent instrumentation. There is no consensus on the importance of C1 anterior arch preservation in prevention of iatrogenic instability. We conducted a systematic review of the impact of C1 anterior arch preservation on postodontoidectomy spine stability.

Methods: PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane were searched following the PRISMA guidelines to include studies of patients undergoing odontoidectomy. Random-effect model meta-analyses were performed to compare spine stability between C1 anterior arch preservation versus removal and posttreatment outcomes between transoral approaches (TOAs) versus endoscopic endonasal approaches (EEAs).

Results: We included 27 studies comprising 462 patients. The most common lesions were basilar invagination (73.3%) and degenerative arthritis (12.6%). Symptoms included myelopathy (72%) and neck pain (43.9%). Odontoidectomy was performed through TOA (56.1%) and EEA corridors (34.4%). The C1 anterior arch was preserved in 16.7% of cases. Postodontoidectomy stabilization was performed in 83.3% patients. Median follow-up was 27 months (range, 0.1-145). Rates of spine instability were significantly lower (P = 0.004) when the C1 anterior arch was preserved. Postoperative clinical improvement and pooled complications were reported in 78.8% and 12.6% of patients, respectively, with no significant differences between TOA and EEA (P = 0.892; P = 0.346). Patients undergoing EEA had significantly higher rates of intraoperative cerebrospinal fluid leaks (P = 0.002).

Conclusions: Odontoidectomy is safe and effective for treating craniovertebral junction lesions. Preservation of the C1 anterior arch seems to improve maintenance of spine stability. TOA and EEA show comparable outcomes and complication rates.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2022.08.105DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

anterior arch
28
arch preservation
16
spine stability
12
impact anterior
8
systematic review
8
craniovertebral junction
8
spine instability
8
patients undergoing
8
arch preserved
8
toa eea
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!