Unlabelled: A neural architecture that preferentially processes immediate survival threats relative to other negatively and positively valenced stimuli presumably evolved to facilitate survival. The empirical literature on threat superiority, however, has suffered two problems: methodologically distinguishing threatening stimuli from negative stimuli and differentiating whether responses are sped and strengthened by threat superiority or delayed and diminished by conscious processing of nonthreatening stimuli. We addressed both problems in three within-subject studies that compared responses to empirically validated sets of threating, negative, positive, and neutral stimuli, and isolated threat superiority from the opposing effect of conscious attention by presenting stimuli outside conscious perception. Consistent with threat superiority, threatening stimuli elicited stronger skin-conductance (Study 1), startle-eyeblink (Study 2), and more negative downstream evaluative responses (Study 3) relative to the undifferentiated responses to negative, positive, and neutral stimuli.

Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s42761-021-00090-6.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9382976PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s42761-021-00090-6DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

threat superiority
16
conscious perception
8
threatening stimuli
8
negative positive
8
positive neutral
8
stimuli
7
threat
5
automatic nature
4
nature threat
4
threat physiological
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!