AI Article Synopsis

  • This study aims to identify the best diagnostic methods for infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis (IHPS) through a systematic review and meta-analysis of various diagnostic techniques.* -
  • After analyzing 43 studies involving over 6000 infants, the research highlighted that palpation is not a very reliable method, with sensitivity ranging from 10% to 93%, while ultrasonography showed a high diagnostic accuracy, particularly using pyloric muscle thickness (PMT) of ≥ 3 mm as a key indicator.* -
  • The findings suggest that ultrasonography is the most effective way to diagnose IHPS, marking the first comprehensive review focused on this condition, which could guide future diagnostic strategies in clinical settings.*

Article Abstract

Objective: Although infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis (IHPS) is a well-known disease, there is no systematic review regarding the optimal diagnostic strategy. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to obtain diagnostic accuracy of all methods to diagnose IHPS.

Methods: According to the Preferred Reported Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines, we searched MEDLINE and Embase to identify studies reporting sensitivity and specificity of all methods used to diagnose IHPS. Inclusion criteria were infants with suspicion of/or diagnosed with IHPS who underwent pyloromyotomy or had clinical follow-up. A random-effects model was used to obtain pooled estimates of sensitivity, specificity and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.

Results: After screening 5364 studies, we included 43 studies with in total 6085 infants ( = 4241 IHPS; = 1844 controls). The diagnostic sensitivity of palpation ranged from 10.0 to 93.4% and decreased over time. Different parameters for ultrasonography were found. Most used parameters were pyloric muscle thickness (PMT) ≥ 3 mm (pooled sensitivity 97.6% and specificity 98.8%), PMT ≥ 4 mm (pooled sensitivity 94.0% and specificity 98.0%) or a combination of PMT ≥ 4 mm and/or pyloric canal length ≥16 mm (pooled sensitivity 94.0% and specificity 91.7%). The AUC showed high diagnostic accuracy (0.997, 0.966 and 0.981 respectively), but large heterogeneity exists. Due to the large differences in cut-off values no meta-analysis could be conducted for pyloric canal length and pyloric diameter.

Conclusion: Palpation has limited sensitivity in diagnosing IHPS. We showed that ultrasonography has highest diagnostic accuracy to diagnose IHPS and we advise to use PMT ≥ 3 mm as cut-off.

Advances In Knowledge: This is the first systematic review and meta-analysis on diagnosing IHPS, which summarizes the available literature and may be used as a guideline.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20211251DOI Listing
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9793478PMC

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

diagnostic accuracy
16
systematic review
16
pmt ≥
16
review meta-analysis
12
pooled sensitivity
12
infantile hypertrophic
8
hypertrophic pyloric
8
pyloric stenosis
8
methods diagnose
8
sensitivity specificity
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!