Unlabelled: We investigated women's anger expression in response to sexism. In three studies s = 103, 317, and 241), we tested the predictions that women less anger about sexism than they -the anger gap-and that the anger expressed by women is associated with instrumental concerns, specifically perceived costs and benefits of confronting sexism. To estimate the specificity of the proposed gap, we compared women's anger reactions to men's anger reactions as well as anger reactions to sadness reactions. Across studies, we found support for the anger gap, that is, lower anger expression than experience, and the gap was more pronounced for women than for men (Study 3). Surprisingly, a gap also occurred in sadness reactions. Regarding instrumental concerns, there was converging evidence that expressed anger was negatively associated with individual costs. We also investigated whether anger expression can be encouraged through women's identification with feminists (Studies 1 and 2) and support by other women (Study 2); yet, we found no evidence. We conclude that, to understand women's-and men's-reactions to sexism, it is critical not to mistake their emotion expression for how they really feel, but instead to also consider strategic concerns.
Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s42761-021-00081-7.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9383010 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s42761-021-00081-7 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!