AI Article Synopsis

  • The study investigates a new method called the keyhole procedure in circular-stapled esophagogastrostomy to reduce postoperative anastomotic stricture after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
  • A review of 70 patients showed that those who underwent the keyhole procedure had a significantly lower incidence of anastomotic stricture (0%) compared to those who did not (18.8%).
  • The findings suggest that the keyhole technique is effective, particularly with smaller-sized circular staplers, offering a promising alternative for surgical treatment.

Article Abstract

Background: Anastomotic leakage of cervical esophagogastrostomy following radical esophagectomy for esophageal cancer has reduced over time; however, postoperative anastomotic stricture still occurs at a considerably high rate. We developed a novel method of circular-stapled esophagogastrostomy by employing the keyhole procedure, which uses a linear stapler to enlarge the anastomotic opening made with a circular stapler (CS).

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 70 patients with esophageal cancer who underwent transthoracic esophagectomy and reconstruction via cervical CS-mediated anastomosis with or without the keyhole procedure between 2018 and 2020. The primary outcome was postoperative anastomotic stricture incidence within 180 days after surgery.

Results: Among 70 patients, 22 underwent the keyhole procedure (CS + K group) and the remaining did not (CS group). No differences were observed in patients' age, sex, body mass index, performance status, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status, Charlson's comorbidity index, tumor histological type, tumor location, clinical stage, or preoperative treatment. A smaller stapler was used in the CS + K group (p < 0.001). Incidence of anastomotic stricture was significantly different (CS vs. CS + K, 18.8 vs. 0%, p = 0.049), especially when a 21 or 23 mm CS was used (CS vs. CS + K, 50.0 vs. 0%, p = 0.005). Univariate analysis confirmed that CS ≤ 23 without keyhole was a significant risk factor (p = 0.001).

Conclusions: The keyhole procedure could be a simple and useful alternative technique that reduces the risk of stricture formation in cervical esophagogastric anastomosis, especially when using the smaller-sized CS.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10388-022-00949-yDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

keyhole procedure
16
esophageal cancer
12
circular-stapled esophagogastrostomy
8
radical esophagectomy
8
esophagectomy esophageal
8
postoperative anastomotic
8
anastomotic stricture
8
cs + k group
8
keyhole
4
esophagogastrostomy keyhole
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!