[Study on the correlation between PPG and HVPG in patients with portal hypertension].

Zhonghua Gan Zang Bing Za Zhi

Department of Gastroenterology, Beijing You 'an Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100069, China.

Published: July 2022

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study investigated the relationship between portal vein pressure gradient (PPG) and hepatic vein pressure gradient (HVPG) in 752 patients with portal hypertension (PHT) who underwent transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) from January 2016 to December 2019.
  • * Statistical analyses, including paired t-tests and Pearson correlation tests, revealed significant differences between HVPG and PPG measurements, with 69.7% of cases showing a difference greater than 5 mmHg.
  • * Patients were categorized based on the presence of hepatic venous collaterals, highlighting notable differences in various pressure measurements between the two groups, all with statistically significant results (p < 0.001).*

Article Abstract

To explore the correlation between portal vein pressure gradient (PPG) and hepatic vein pressure gradient (HVPG) in patients with portal hypertension (PHT). 752 cases with portal hypertension (PHT) who underwent transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) and met the enrollment criteria between January 2016 to December 2019 were analyzed for hepatic vein, inferior vena cava and portal vein pressure. Paired t-test was used for analysis. Pearson correlation test was used to estimate correlation coefficient and coefficient of determination. <0.05 were considered statistically significant. Wedged hepatic vein pressure (WHVP), portal vein pressure (PVP), correlation coefficient, and coefficient of determination were 27.98±8.95 mmHg, 33.85±7.33 mmHg, 0.329 (<0.001), and 0.108, respectively. HVPG, PPG,correlation coefficient, and coefficient of determination were 16.84±7.97 mmHg, 25.11±6.95 mmHg (<0.001), 0.145, and 0.021 (<0.001), respectively. The difference between HVPG and PPG was greater than 5 mmHg in 524 cases, accounting for 69.7%. The difference between HVPG and PPG was within 5 mmHg or basically equal in 228 cases, accounting for 30.3%. The correlation coefficient between free hepatic venous pressure (FHVP) and inferior vena cava pressure (IVCP) was 0.568 (<0.001), and the coefficient of determination was 0.323. According to the presence or absence of hepatic venous collaterals after balloon occluded hepatic angiography, they were divided into two groups: 157 (20.9%) cases in the group with hepatic venous collaterals, and 595 (79.1%) cases in the group without hepatic venous collaterals. The parameters of the two groups were compared: WHVP (15.73±3.63) mmHg . (31.22±6.90) mmHg, <0.001; PVP (31.69±8.70) mmHg . (34.42±6.81) mmHg, <0.001; HVPG (7.18±4.40) mmHg . (19.40±6.62) mmHg, <0.001; PPG (24.24±8.11) mmHg . (25.34±6.60) mmHg, <0.001; free hepatic venous pressure (FHVP) (8.58±3.37) mmHg . (11.82±5.07) mmHg , <0.001; inferior vena cava pressure (IVCP) (7.45±3.29) mmHg . (9.09±4.14) mmHg, <0.001. The overall correlation is poor between HVPG and PPG. HVPG of most patients is not an accurate representation of PPG, and the former is lower than the latter. Hepatic venous collateral formation is one of the important reasons for the serious underestimation of HVPG values.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn501113-20200603-00291DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

vein pressure
12
hvpg patients
8
patients portal
8
portal vein
8
pressure gradient
8
hepatic vein
8
portal hypertension
8
hypertension pht
8
portal
5
[study correlation
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!