A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Fractional microneedle radiofrequency treatment for enlarged facial pores: A real-world retrospective observational study on 75 patients. | LitMetric

Objective: This study aimed to analyze the clinical results and influencing factors of the fractional microneedle radiofrequency (FMR) treatment for enlarged facial pores on different facial sites.

Methods: The clinical data of patients with enlarged facial pores who underwent FMR treatment from January 2019 to December 2020 were collected. The efficacy and complications of FMR for enlarged pores in different facial areas were retrospectively analyzed. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to explore the clinical factors related to the efficacy of FMR after the first treatment session.

Results: Totally, 75 patients with enlarged facial pores were included (full-face FMR for 45, nasal FMR for 58, frontal FMR for 45, and cheek FMR for 72 patients). All patients received more than one treatment session, two patients received five treatment sessions, and the mean number of FMR session was 1.7. The moderate to excellent improvement rates in patients with nasal, frontal and cheek enlarged pores after the first session were 13.8%, 8.9%, and 11.1%, respectively. The improvement rate rose with the increasing number of treatment sessions. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that long pulse-width (300 ms) was positively associated with clinical efficacy after the first session (OR = 22.4, 95% CI [2.0-250.4], p = 0.012), compared with the short pulse-width group (100-200 ms). The main adverse effects after FMR were transient pain, erythema, and edema. A minority of patients developed acneiform eruption.

Conclusion: This study confirms that FMR is safe and effective in improving enlarged facial pores. The pulse width is associated with the improvement of nasal enlarged pores.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jocd.15339DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

enlarged facial
20
facial pores
20
fmr treatment
12
enlarged pores
12
fmr
11
fractional microneedle
8
microneedle radiofrequency
8
enlarged
8
treatment enlarged
8
pores
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!