AI Article Synopsis

  • Patient-reported outcome measures, particularly disease-specific questionnaires like the ASTA, are crucial for gathering insights into patient experiences, but must be validated in their target populations for reliable data.
  • The study utilized Rasch measurement theory to assess the ASTA questionnaire's fit, reliability, and applicability among 202 patients, most of whom had atrial fibrillation, revealing some issues with item fit and response category functioning.
  • Overall, while the ASTA questionnaire showed satisfactory measurement properties according to Rasch analysis, further evaluation in different arrhythmia populations and a review of its response categories are recommended for improvement.

Article Abstract

Background: Patient-reported outcome measures are important in person-centered care, providing valuable information about patients' experiences. Disease-specific questionnaires add important information about a certain disease in comparison to generic questionnaires. Questionnaires need to be validated in the targeted population to achieve reliable data. The purpose with the study was to use Rasch measurement theory to evaluate the English version of the ASTA questionnaire.

Methods: The Rasch model theory was used to evaluate global and item fit, targeting, response category functioning, local independency, unidimensionality, differential item functioning (DIF) for gender and age, and reliability.

Results: The study included 202 patients undergoing DC conversion or catheter ablation at the Centre for Heart Rhythm Disorders at the University of Adelaide, Australia. The mean age was 67 years and 30% were women. Most patients had atrial fibrillation (n = 179), others had atrial flutter or had a combination. One of nine items demonstrated unsatisfactory model fit in the ASTA Symptom scale and two of 13 in the ASTA Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) scale. Unidimensionality was supported for both scales. The targeting was acceptable except for the lower end of the scales. Both scales showed reversed thresholds for the response categories "quite a lot" and "a lot" (eight of ASTA symptoms and 12 of ASTA HRQoL items). Some problems with local dependency were detected in both scales. The reliability (person separation index) was satisfactory: 0.75 for the ASTA symptom scale and 0.77 for the ASTA HRQoL scale. No DIF for gender and age were detected.

Conclusions: The English version of the ASTA questionnaire demonstrated satisfactory measurement properties according to the Rasch model. However, it needs to be evaluated in patients with other arrhythmias. The response categories should be considered as well as DIF in further validation. The ASTA questionnaire can be used for assessments of symptoms and HRQoL between groups of different ages and genders in patients with arrhythmia.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9418394PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41687-022-00493-4DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

english version
12
asta
10
theory evaluate
8
version asta
8
rasch model
8
dif gender
8
gender age
8
asta symptom
8
symptom scale
8
hrqol scale
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!