The MEMS array-based inertial navigation module (M-IMU) reduces the measurement singularities of MEMS sensors by fusing multiple data processing to improve its navigation performance. However, there are still existing random and fixed errors in M-IMU navigation. The calibration method calibrates the fixed error parameters of M-IMU to further improve navigation accuracy. In this paper, we propose a low-cost and efficient calibration method to effectively estimate the fixed error parameters of M-IMU. Firstly, we manually rotate the M-IMU in multiple sets of different attitudes (stationary), then use the LM-calibration algorithm to optimize the cost function of the corresponding sensors in different intervals of the stationary-dynamic filter separation to obtain the fixed error parameters of MEMS, and finally, the global fixed error parameters of the M-IMU are calibrated by adaptive support fusion of the individual MEMS fixed error parameters based on the benchmark conversion. A comparison of the MEMS calibrated separately by the fusion-calibration algorithm and the LM-calibration algorithm verified that the calibrated MEMS array improved the measurement accuracy by about 10 db and reduced the dispersion of the output data by about 8 db compared to the individual MEMS in a multi-dimensional test environment, indicating the robustness and feasibility of the fusion calibration algorithm.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9415369 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mi13081214 | DOI Listing |
JMIR Form Res
December 2024
Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 625 N. Michigan Avenue, Suite 2700, Chicago, IL 60611, Chicago, US.
Background: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are crucial for informed medical decisions and evaluating treatments. However, they can be burdensome for patients and sometimes lack the reliability clinicians need for clear clinical interpretations.
Objective: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are crucial for informed medical decisions and evaluating treatments.
Plast Reconstr Surg
January 2025
Division of Plastic Surgery, Mayo Clinic; Rochester, MN.
Introduction: Quantitative neuromorphometry analysis of the peripheral nerve is paramount to nerve regeneration research. However, this technique relies upon accurate segmentation and determination of myelin and axonal area. Manual histological analysis methods are time- consuming, and subject to error and bias.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Chem Phys
January 2025
Machine Learning Group, Technische Universität Berlin, 10587 Berlin, Charlottenburg, Germany.
We introduce the alchemical harmonic approximation (AHA) of the absolute electronic energy for charge-neutral iso-electronic diatomics at fixed interatomic distance d0. To account for variations in distance, we combine AHA with this ansatz for the electronic binding potential, E(d)=(Eu-Es)Ec-EsEu-Esd/d0+Es, where Eu, Ec, Es correspond to the energies of the united atom, calibration at d0, and the sum of infinitely separated atoms, respectively. Our model covers the two-dimensional electronic potential energy surface spanned by distances of 0.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFInt J Nurs Stud
January 2025
Finnish Institute of Occupational Health (FIOH), Helsinki and Oulu, Finland.
Background: Short intervals between shifts, known as quick returns, have been linked to adverse health effects, and increased risk of occupational accidents, particularly among healthcare employees. To safeguard employee health, the 2020 reform of Working Time Act in Finland limited rest periods under 11 h in irregular shift work.
Objective: To evaluate the changes in quick returns following the 2020 reform of the Working Time Act in Finland and their association with sickness absence among public healthcare employees.
iScience
January 2025
Department of Neurobiology, School of Basic Medicine, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China.
Humans and animals excel at learning complex tasks through reward-based feedback, dynamically adjusting value expectations and choices based on past experiences to optimize outcomes. However, understanding the hidden cognitive components driving these behaviors remains challenging. Neuroscientists use the Temporal Difference (TD) learning model to estimate cognitive elements like value representation and prediction error during learning and decision-making processes.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!