A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Chicken Gut Microbiota Responses to Dietary Probiotic in the Presence and Absence of Infection. | LitMetric

Chicken Gut Microbiota Responses to Dietary Probiotic in the Presence and Absence of Infection.

Microorganisms

State Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-Bioresources, College of Animal Science and Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China.

Published: July 2022

Coccidiosis is a well-known poultry disease that causes the severe destruction of the intestinal tract, resulting in reduced growth performance and immunity, disrupted gut homeostasis and perturbed gut microbiota. Supplementation of probiotics were explored to play a key role in improving growth performance, enhancing innate and adaptive immunity, maintaining gut homeostasis and modulating gut microbiota during enteric infection. This study was therefore designed to investigate the chicken gut whole microbiota responses to () probiotic feeding in the presence as well as absence of infection. For that purpose, 84 newly hatched chicks were assigned into four groups, including (1) non-treated non-challenged control group (CG - ET), (2) non-treated challenged control group (CG + ET), (3) -fed non-challenged group (BS - ET) and (4) -fed challenged group (BS + ET). CG + ET and BS + ET groups were challenged with () on 21 day of housing. Our results for Alpha diversity revealed that chickens in both infected groups (CG + ET and BS + ET) had lowest indexes of Ace, Chao 1 and Shannon, while highest indexes of Simpson were found in comparison to non-challenged groups (CG - ET and BS - ET). was the most affected phylum in all experimental groups following and , which showed increased abundance in both non-challenged groups, whereas and affected both challenged groups. The linear discriminant analysis effect size method (lEfSe) analysis revealed that compared to the CG + ET group, supplementation of probiotic in the presence of infection increased the abundance of some commensal genera, included , , , , , , and , with roles in butyrate production, anti-inflammation, metabolic reactions and the modulation of protective pathways against pathogens. Collectively, these findings evidenced that supplementation of probiotic was positively influenced with commensal genera, thereby alleviating the -induced intestinal disruption.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9412415PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10081548DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

gut microbiota
16
chicken gut
8
microbiota responses
8
probiotic presence
8
absence infection
8
growth performance
8
gut homeostasis
8
control group
8
group -fed
8
groups challenged
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!