Complexity quantification, through entropy, information theory and fractal dimension indices, is gaining a renewed traction in psychophsyiology, as new measures with promising qualities emerge from the computational and mathematical advances. Unfortunately, few studies compare the relationship and objective performance of the plethora of existing metrics, in turn hindering reproducibility, replicability, consistency, and clarity in the field. Using the NeuroKit2 Python software, we computed a list of 112 (predominantly used) complexity indices on signals varying in their characteristics (noise, length and frequency spectrum). We then systematically compared the indices by their computational weight, their representativeness of a multidimensional space of latent dimensions, and empirical proximity with other indices. Based on these considerations, we propose that a selection of 12 indices, together representing 85.97% of the total variance of all indices, might offer a parsimonious and complimentary choice in regards to the quantification of the complexity of time series. Our selection includes , , , , , , , , , , , . Elements of consideration for alternative subsets are discussed, and data, analysis scripts and code for the figures are open-source.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9407071PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e24081036DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

complexity indices
8
indices
7
structure chaos
4
chaos empirical
4
empirical comparison
4
comparison fractal
4
fractal physiology
4
complexity
4
physiology complexity
4
indices neurokit2
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!