Ecological risk assessment (ERA) has been applied on assessing the relative risk of bycatch species in recent years. ERA index is calculated by productivity of species and susceptibility of fisheries on fish species. In this study, a semi-quantitative method was used to evaluate the risks of exploitation for 20 pelagic fish species by the small-scale longline fisheries in the western North Pacific Ocean. The productivity was estimated based on the ranking (high, median, and low) of seven life history parameters. The susceptibility was calculated by the multiplication of the catchability, selectivity and post-capture mortality. The ERA results indicated the risks of sharks are higher than those of tunas and billfishes, except yellowfin tuna (). The shortfin mako shark () and dusky shark () have the highest risk. Other shark species, yellowfin tuna, and sailfish () have medium risk. While the striped marlin (), and albacore tuna () have the lowest risk. Stock assessment and rigorous management measures such as catch quota and size limit are recommended for the species in high or medium ecological risk and a consistent monitoring management scheme is suggested for those in low ecological risk.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9404817PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani12162124DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

ecological risk
16
fish species
12
pelagic fish
8
small-scale longline
8
western north
8
north pacific
8
risk
8
risk assessment
8
yellowfin tuna
8
species
7

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!