AI Article Synopsis

  • The study investigates how the positioning of tissue-level implants affects marginal bone resorption based on the thickness of the mucosa prior to prosthetic loading.
  • Patients were grouped according to their mucosal thickness, with those having thinner mucosa experiencing more significant bone resorption compared to those with thicker mucosa after 5 months.
  • The findings suggest that adjusting the depth of implants based on mucosal thickness can significantly reduce the risk of early surface exposure, particularly in patients with thinner mucosa.

Article Abstract

Introduction: Supracrestal tissue height establishment is a crucial factor influencing peri-implant marginal bone modifications prior to prosthesis delivery. If mucosal thickness is insufficient, peri-implant marginal bone resorption occurs to allow appropriate supracrestal tissue height formation. This study evaluates if marginal bone resorption occurring around tissue-level implants before prosthetic loading could be compensated by adapting apico-coronal positioning to mucosal thickness.

Methods: Patients requiring placement of one single implant in the posterior mandible were treated with tissue-level implants with a 3-mm high transmucosal machined component and moderately rough implant body. Based upon vertical mucosal thickness measured after buccal flap reflection, implants were placed with the treated part: (group 1) 2 mm below crestal level in presence of thin mucosa (<2.5 mm); (group 2) 1 mm below the crestal level in presence of medium mucosa (2.5-3.5 mm); (group 3) at equicrestal level in presence of thick mucosa (>3.5 mm).

Results: Forty-nine implants, placed in 49 patients were included in final analysis (group 1: 18 implants; group 2: 16 implants; group 3: 15 implants). Mean marginal bone resorption after 5 months of healing was 0.66 ± 0.49 mm, 0.32 ± 0.41 mm, and 0.22 ± 0.52 mm in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Inter-group analysis highlighted significant differences between the three groups after ANOVA test (p = 0.025). However, adaptation of apico-coronal implant positioning in relation to mucosal thickness, allowed to avoid early exposure of the treated surface in 100%, 93.7%, and 53.3% of the implants in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively.

Conclusion: During supracrestal tissue height formation, tissue-level implants inserted adapting apico-coronal positioning in relation to mucosal thickness exhibited greater marginal bone resorption at sites with thin mucosa than at sites with medium or thick mucosa. However, anticipating supracrestal tissue height establishment by adapting apico-coronal implant positioning in relation to mucosal thickness may effectively prevent unwanted exposure of treated implant surface.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cid.13128DOI Listing
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9804736PMC

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

marginal bone
24
supracrestal tissue
20
tissue height
20
mucosal thickness
20
tissue-level implants
16
bone resorption
16
apico-coronal positioning
12
height establishment
12
adapting apico-coronal
12
group implants
12

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!