Background: We investigated whether question format and access to the correct answers affect the pass mark set by standard-setters on written examinations.
Methods: Trained educators used the Angoff method to standard set two 50-item tests with identical vignettes, one in a single best answer question (SBAQ) format (with five answer options) and the other in a very short answer question (VSAQ) format (requiring free text responses). Half the participants had access to the correct answers and half did not. The data for each group were analysed to determine if the question format or having access to the answers affected the pass mark set.
Results: A lower pass mark was set for the VSAQ test than the SBAQ test by the standard setters who had access to the answers (median difference of 13.85 percentage points, Z = -2.82, p = 0.002). Comparable pass marks were set for the SBAQ test by standard setters with and without access to the correct answers (60.65% and 60.90% respectively). A lower pass mark was set for the VSAQ test when participants had access to the correct answers (difference in medians -13.75 percentage points, Z = 2.46, p = 0.014).
Conclusions: When given access to the potential correct answers, standard setters appear to appreciate the increased difficulty of VSAQs compared to SBAQs.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9396833 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03693-0 | DOI Listing |
Vaccines (Basel)
December 2024
Faculty of Medicine, University of Novi Sad, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia.
Background/objectives: Adequate knowledge and correct attitudes about the HPV vaccine influence awareness of the importance of preventing HPV-related diseases, which is particularly important for future healthcare professionals. We aim to examine the share of correct answers and the prevalence of different attitudes about the HPV vaccine among active regular students of the Faculty of Medicine in Novi Sad.
Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted from 1 to 30 November 2023 using a structured survey questionnaire.
J Imaging
January 2025
School of Information Technology, Sripatum University, Bangkok 10900, Thailand.
This study introduces a novel AI-driven approach to support elderly patients in Thailand with medication management, focusing on accurate drug label interpretation. Two model architectures were explored: a Two-Stage Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and Large Language Model (LLM) pipeline combining EasyOCR with Qwen2-72b-instruct and a Uni-Stage Visual Question Answering (VQA) model using Qwen2-72b-VL. Both models operated in a zero-shot capacity, utilizing Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) with DrugBank references to ensure contextual relevance and accuracy.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFHum Fertil (Camb)
December 2025
Instituto Superior Miguel Torga, Coimbra, Portugal.
Infertility is increasing globally, affecting one in six adults due to factors like delayed childbearing and lifestyle changes. Despite the recognition of the importance of increasing fertility awareness, levels remain low. This study evaluated the perceptions of 'FActs!', a serious game aimed at improving adolescents' fertility awareness.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Eat Disord
January 2025
Bodywhys - The Eating Disorders Association of Ireland, 105, Blackrock, Co, Dublin, Ireland.
J Cannabis Res
January 2025
Department of Biology, Colorado State University Pueblo, 2200 Bonforte Blvd, Pueblo, CO, 81001, USA.
Background: The effect of oral Cannabidiol (CBD) on interference during learning and memory (L&M) in healthy human volunteers has not been studied.
Method: A two-arm crossover, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted at Colorado State University Pueblo (CSU Pueblo) to evaluate the effects of 246 mg oral CBD on L&M in healthy adults. Among 57 healthy volunteers enrolled, 35 were included in the analyses.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!