A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Masking auditory feedback does not eliminate repetition reduction. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • Repetition of words makes them shorter when spoken.
  • Researchers have looked into various theories to explain this, including how speakers design their speech for their audience and internal mechanisms for producing words.
  • A study tested the idea that speakers need to hear a word to produce it shorter next time, using methods that limited their ability to hear themselves, yet still found that word duration reduction happened regardless of the feedback limitations.
  • This indicates that other types of feedback, like physical sensations while speaking, may also play a role in how repetition affects speech duration.

Article Abstract

Repetition reduces word duration. Explanations of this process have appealed to audience design, internal production mechanisms, and combinations thereof (e.g. Kahn & Arnold, 2015). Jacobs, Yiu, Watson, and Dell (2015) proposed the auditory feedback hypothesis, which states that speakers must hear a word, produced either by themselves or another speaker, in order for duration reduction on a subsequent production. We conducted a strong test of the auditory feedback hypothesis in two experiments, in which we used masked auditory feedback and whispering to prevent speakers from hearing themselves fully. Both experiments showed that despite limiting the sources of normal auditory feedback, repetition reduction was observed to equal extents in masked and unmasked conditions, suggesting that repetition reduction may be supported by multiple sources, such as somatosensory feedback and feedforward signals, depending on their availability.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9390968PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2019.1693051DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

auditory feedback
20
repetition reduction
12
feedback hypothesis
8
feedback
6
masking auditory
4
feedback eliminate
4
repetition
4
eliminate repetition
4
reduction
4
reduction repetition
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!