Emissions from aviation and airport-related activities degrade surface air quality but received limited attention relative to regular transportation sectors like road traffic and waterborne vessels. Statistically, assessing the impact of airport-related emissions remains a challenge due to the fact that its signal in the air quality time series data is largely dwarfed by meteorology and other emissions. Flight-ban policy has been implemented in a number of cities in response to the COVID-19 spread since early 2020, which provides an unprecedented opportunity to examine the changes in air quality attributable to airport closure. It would also be interesting to know whether such an intervention produces extra marginal air quality benefits, in addition to road traffic. Here we investigated the impact of airport-related emissions from a civil airport on nearby NO air quality by applying machine learning predictive model to observational data collected from this unique quasi-natural experiment. The whole lockdown-attributable change in NO was 16.7 μg/m, equals to a drop of 73% in NO with respect to the business-as-usual level. Meanwhile, the airport flight-ban aviation-attributable NO was 3.1 μg/m, accounting for a marginal reduction of 18.6% of the overall NO change that driven by the whole lockdown effect. The airport-related emissions contributed up to 24% of the local ambient NO under normal conditions. Additionally, the average impact of airport-related emissions on the nearby air quality was ∼0.01 ± 0.001 μg/m NO per air-flight. Our results highlight that attention needs to be paid to such a considerable emission source in many places where regular air quality regulatory measures were insufficient to bring NO concentration into compliance with the health-based limit.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2022.114117 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!