Emotional Reactivity, Emotion Regulation, and Regulatory Choice in Somatic Symptom Disorder.

Psychosom Med

From the Department of Clinical Psychology, Psychotherapy, and Experimental Psychopathology (Schnabel, Witthöft), Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz; and Department of Psychology (Biological Psychology, Clinical Psychology, and Psychotherapy) (Schulz), Julius-Maximilians-University Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.

Published: November 2022

Objective: Despite the transdiagnostic importance of emotional dysregulation in psychopathology, the exact nature of emotional dysregulation in somatic symptom disorders (SSDs) is still unclear. The present study compared measures of emotional reactivity, emotion regulation (ER), and regulatory choice between n = 62 individuals with SSD ( Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition ) and n = 61 healthy participants.

Methods: Participants underwent two ER tasks, assessing a) efficacy of reappraisal and suppression, and 2) regulatory choice, while electrodermal activity and heart rate variability were recorded. In addition, self-reports (Emotion Reactivity Scale, Emotion Regulation Questionnaire, Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale) regarding habitual emotional reactions and regulation strategies were assessed.

Results: Individuals with SSD reported significantly higher trait emotional reactivity (Emotion Reactivity Scale; p < .001, d = 1.61), significantly more trait ER difficulties (Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale; p < .001, d = 1.62), and significantly lower reappraisal use in daily life (Emotion Regulation Questionnaire; p < .001, d = -0.75). On a behavioral and physiological levels, no significant group differences were found regarding emotional reactivity (subjective ratings of emotional stimuli in task 1, p values = .653-.667; electrodermal activity: p values = .224-.837), ER (task 1: p values = .077-.731; heart rate variability: p values = .522-.832), or regulatory choice (task 2: p = .380). Although individuals with SSD were equally effective in state ER (task 1), they perceived ER during the task as significantly more effortful ( p = .038, d = -0.38).

Conclusions: Results suggest that dysregulated emotions might not result from lacking abilities in implementing ER effectively, but rather could arise from less frequent ER initiation because ER is perceived as more effortful.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PSY.0000000000001118DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

emotion regulation
24
emotional reactivity
16
regulatory choice
16
reactivity emotion
12
individuals ssd
12
emotional
8
emotion
8
regulation regulatory
8
somatic symptom
8
emotional dysregulation
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!