Osteosarcoma pre-diagnosed as another tumor: a report from the Cooperative Osteosarcoma Study Group (COSS).

J Cancer Res Clin Oncol

Cooperative Osteosarcoma Study Group, Pediatrics 5 (Oncology, Hematology, Immunology), Center for Pediatric, Adolescent and Women's Medicine, Stuttgart Cancer Center, Klinikum Stuttgart - Olgahospital, Kriegsbergstr. 62, 70174, Stuttgart, Germany.

Published: May 2023

Purpose: The course of osteosarcoma patients primarily treated as such has been well described. Little, however, is known about patients who were primarily treated assuming a different tumor diagnosis.

Methods: The database of the Cooperative Osteosarcoma Study Group COSS was searched (4.435 primary high-grade central osteosarcomas registered prior to 01/01/21). A different tumor entity had to have been assumed for at least one month after the initial diagnostic procedure before the correct diagnosis of osteosarcoma was finally made. Identified patients were analyzed for demographic, tumor-, and treatment-related factors as well as for survival outcomes.

Results: 37 patients were identified. They were a median of 19.7 (2.7-60.4) years old at first presentation and were more likely to be females than males (23:14). Bone cysts (n = 8), giant cell tumor of bone (n = 6), and osteoblastoma (n = 6) were the most frequent of 29/37 (78%) benign, chondrosarcoma and its variants (n = 6) the most frequent of 8/37 (22%) malignant original diagnoses. Tumors affected the extremities in 23 (62%), the trunk in 11 (30%), and the craniofacial bones in 3 (8%). Only one patient received systemic treatment while assuming the different diagnosis (1/37, 3%). The median time until the correct diagnosis of osteosarcoma was made was 8 months (range: 1 month-14.1 years). At that time, 6/37 (16%) presented with metastatic disease. All patients went on to receive chemotherapy, 17/37 (46%) neo-adjuvantly. Histologic response was only evaluated in 13/17 (76%) patients and was good (< 10% viable tumor) in only 4/13 (31%) patients. In 31/37 (84%) patients, a surgically complete resection of all macroscopically identified tumor manifestations could be achieved. Five-year overall and event-free survival rates at 5 years were 50.2% (standard error: 8.6%) and 42.6% (8.5%), respectively.

Conclusion: Osteosarcoma may initially be misdiagnosed and hence subjected to inappropriate treatment including misguided surgery. Once diagnosed correctly, some of the affected patients may still be cured if finally treated according to modern osteosarcoma standards.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-022-04156-1DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cooperative osteosarcoma
8
osteosarcoma study
8
study group
8
group coss
8
patients treated
8
correct diagnosis
8
diagnosis osteosarcoma
8
n = 6 frequent
8
osteosarcoma
6
patients
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!