A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Correlation of MRI signal characteristics of intracranial melanoma metastases with BRAF mutation status. | LitMetric

BRAF V600 mutations (BRAF mut ) are associated with more pigmentation in primary melanomas, but data on melanin content of metastases are limited. This study compares signal characteristics of BRAF mut and BRAF-wildtype (BRAF wt ) intracranial melanoma metastases (IMM). MRI brain examinations at first diagnosis of IMM were identified, all performed at 3-Tesla including 1 mm volumetric pre- and postcontrast T1-weighted imaging and susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI). Individual metastases were assessed by a neuroradiologist, stratified by size (≥10 mm, 'larger', vs. 2-9 mm, 'small'; up to 10 per group); presence of intrinsic T1-hyperintensity (T1H) and, if present, whether confidently attributable to melanin as opposed to haemorrhage; evidence of haemorrhage; presence of central necrosis. A total of 267 IMM in 73 patients were assessed (87 larger IMM, 180 small). The proportion of larger IMM was similar in both groups (31% BRAF mut and 36% BRAF wt ). In small IMM, MRI evidence of melanin was more common in BRAF mut patients (42% vs. 26%; P = 0.038). Haemorrhage was more common in larger IMM (51%, vs. 20% of small IMM; P < 0.0001), but did not differ based on BRAF status. Central necrosis was more common in larger IMM (44% vs. 7%; P < 0.0001) and in BRAF mut IMM (23% vs. 11%; P = 0.011). In the BRAF mut cohort, central necrosis was more common in patients without previous anti-BRAF therapy (33% vs. 7%; P = 0.0001). T1H attributable to melanin is only slightly more common in BRAF mut IMM than BRAF wt . Higher rates of central necrosis in BRAF mut patients without previous anti-BRAF therapy suggest that anti-BRAF therapy may affect the patterns of IMM growth.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CMR.0000000000000847DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

braf mut
32
central necrosis
16
larger imm
16
braf
14
imm
12
anti-braf therapy
12
signal characteristics
8
intracranial melanoma
8
melanoma metastases
8
mut
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!