Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Background: Dyslipidaemia is frequently associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus and it is the major contributor to cardiovascular diseases among type 2 diabetic patients. Despite the fact that several researches have proven the association between glycemic control and dylipidemia in type 2 diabetic patients, the results are rather varied.
Objectives: The aim of the study is to investigate the clinical relevance of lipid profile as predictive biochemical model for glycemic control in type 2 diabetic patients.
Methods: A cross-sectional study including 329 type 2 diabetic patients was done in Al-Sadr Teaching Hospital, Basrah, Iraq. Brief history, clinical examination, and investigations including fasting plasma glucose, lipid profile, and glycosylated hemoglobin were done. HbA1c >7% was considered as poor glycemic control. Receiver operator characteristics (ROC) analysis and logistic regression analysis were used to evaluate the association between lipid profile and HbA1c level.
Results: Out of 329 diabetic patients, 278 (84.5%) showed poor glycemic control. The univariate analysis showed a significant association between lipid parameters and poor glycemic control. ROC and logistic regression analyses found that TC/HDL (OR: 4.94; 95% CI: 2.35-10.41; P < 0.001) and LDL/HDL (OR: 4.63; 95% CI: 1.96-10.98; P < 0.001) were the only significant independent predictors of glycemic control, while non-HDL cholesterol was a weak predictor of glycemic control despite its significant association (P = 0.02).
Conclusion: LDL/HDL and TC/HDL ratios reveal promising indicators for predicting glycemic control in type 2 diabetic patients.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9372478 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.5339/qmj.2022.32 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!