Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9382161 | PMC |
| http://dx.doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2022.306993 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Imagining Coat-Hangers and Pills: A Qualitative Exploration of Abortion Beliefs and Attitudes in Hostile Policy Contexts in the United States.
Perspect Sex Reprod Health
January 2025
Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
Objective: We explored awareness of and attitudes about the safety of various methods people use to attempt to end a pregnancy without medical assistance, which we refer to in this study collectively as self-managed abortion (SMA).
Methods: In 2020, we invited individuals living in eight United States (US) states considered "hostile" to abortion rights or with a history of criminalizing abortions performed outside the formal healthcare system to participate in semi-structured telephone interviews regarding their attitudes toward these practices. We analyzed coded transcripts for content and themes.
Adolescents' political and personal responses to recent policies restricting abortion and gender-affirming care.
Contracept X
December 2024
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Section of Compex Family Planning, Ci3 at the University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.
Objectives: Restrictive policies on abortion and gender-affirming care have increased in recent years, particularly in some Midwest states, and can have a disproportionate impact on young people. We sought to explore adolescent perspectives on such policies.
Study Design: We conducted virtual semistructured interviews with 39 participants aged 16 to 19 residing in the Midwest between April and June 2023, exploring participant reactions to state policies on abortion and gender-affirming care.
Student and Physician Views of How the Dobbs Decision Affects Training and Practice Location Preferences: Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study.
Interact J Med Res
January 2025
Department of Medicine, University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States.
Background: By allowing for abortion bans and restrictions to take effect in the majority of US states, the 2022 Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization decision portends to have lasting impacts on patient care and the physician workforce. Notably, it is already beginning to impact practice location preferences of US health care workers, evidenced by declining application rates to residency programs in abortion-restrictive states since 2022. Yet, there remains a gap in the literature regarding why this trend exists.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFMotivations for obtaining advance provision of medication abortion in the United States: a qualitative study.
BMJ Sex Reprod Health
December 2024
Lyndon B. Johnson School of Public Affairs, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA.
Background: Advance provision of medication abortion, or the prescription of mifepristone and misoprostol before pregnancy occurs, is an unexplored care model aimed at expanding abortion access. We examine motivations for obtaining advance provision from the online telemedicine service, Aid Access, which supports people in the United States.
Methods: Between May and November 2023, we conducted semi-structured, in-depth interviews with 39 people who obtained advance provision between January 2022 and April 2023.
Reproductive Healthcare After : Rethinking Obstetric Harm in the United States.
Med Anthropol
December 2024
Boston College School of Social Work, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts, USA.
Article Synopsis
- The obstetric violence framework highlights how clinicians can inflict physical and psychological harm on pregnant individuals, often violating their autonomy.
- In this study, interviews with 54 OB-GYNs in US states with strict abortion laws reveal that state actions can contribute to these harms within clinical settings.
- By recognizing the influence of state legislators, we can better understand OB-GYNs as victims of systemic factors rather than solely as perpetrators of obstetric violence.
Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!