Low-frequency interaural time differences and high-frequency interaural level differences (ILDs) are used to localize sounds in the horizontal plane. Older listeners appear to be worse at horizontal-plane sound localization to compared younger listeners, but little is understood about age-related changes to across-frequency binaural processing. This study investigated if the frequency dependence of across-frequency ILD processing is altered for older compared to younger listeners, which was done by using an across-frequency binaural interference task (when the interaural difference sensitivity for a target sound is decreased by a spectrally remote interfering sound with zero interaural differences). It was hypothesized that as listeners experience advancing age and age-related high-frequency hearing loss (i.e., presbycusis), they will demonstrate worse binaural performance and experience more across-channel binaural interference (because of age-related temporal processing deficits), and will increasingly be affected by interferers at lower frequencies (because of age-related hearing loss) when compared to younger listeners. There were 11 older (>65 yrs) and 20 younger (<30 yrs) listeners with normal to near-normal audiometric thresholds up to 2 kHz. They were tested using a left-right ILD lateralization discrimination task. Single-tone ILD discrimination thresholds and across-frequency binaural interference were measured at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 kHz. ILD thresholds and interference were about twice as large for older compared to younger listeners. Interferers ≤1 kHz produced 2-3 times as much across-frequency binaural interference for older compared to younger listeners. Hearing thresholds were significant predictors of single-tone ILD thresholds; in addition, both target and interferer hearing thresholds were significant predictors of binaural interference. The results suggest a reweighting of binaural information that occurs with advancing age and age-related high-frequency hearing loss. This evidence of plasticity may help explain some of the age-related changes in spatial-hearing abilities.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9363899 | PMC |
| http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2022.887401 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Investigating the optimal stimulus to evoke the binaural interaction component of the auditory brainstem response.
Hear Res
December 2023
Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO 80045, USA; Department of Otolaryngology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.
Objective assessment of spatial and binaural hearing deficits remains a major clinical challenge. The binaural interaction component (BIC) of the auditory brainstem response (ABR) holds promise as a non-invasive biomarker for diagnosing such deficits. However, while comparative studies have reported robust BIC in animal models, BIC in humans can sometimes be unreliably evoked even in subjects with normal hearing.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFNeural coding of dichotic pitches in auditory midbrain.
J Neurophysiol
April 2023
Eaton-Peabody Laboratories, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
Dichotic pitches such as the Huggins pitch (HP) and the binaural edge pitch (BEP) are perceptual illusions whereby binaural noise that exhibits abrupt changes in interaural phase differences (IPDs) across frequency creates a tonelike pitch percept when presented to both ears, even though it does not produce a pitch when presented monaurally. At the perceptual and cortical levels, dichotic pitches behave as if an actual tone had been presented to the ears, yet investigations of neural correlates of dichotic pitch in single-unit responses at subcortical levels are lacking. We tested for cues to HP and BEP in the responses of binaural neurons in the auditory midbrain of anesthetized cats by varying the expected pitch frequency around each neuron's best frequency (BF).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFResponses to dichotic tone-in-noise stimuli in the inferior colliculus.
Front Neurosci
December 2022
Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, United States.
Human listeners are more sensitive to tones embedded in diotic noise when the tones are out-of-phase at the two ears (NS) than when they are in-phase (NS). The difference between the tone-detection thresholds for these two conditions is referred to as the binaural masking level difference (BMLD) and reflects a benefit of binaural processing. Detection in the NS condition has been explained in modeling studies by changes in interaural correlation (IAC), but this model has only been directly tested physiologically for low frequencies.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAge-Related Changes in Interaural-Level-Difference-Based Across-Frequency Binaural Interference.
Front Aging Neurosci
July 2022
Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, United States.
Low-frequency interaural time differences and high-frequency interaural level differences (ILDs) are used to localize sounds in the horizontal plane. Older listeners appear to be worse at horizontal-plane sound localization to compared younger listeners, but little is understood about age-related changes to across-frequency binaural processing. This study investigated if the frequency dependence of across-frequency ILD processing is altered for older compared to younger listeners, which was done by using an across-frequency binaural interference task (when the interaural difference sensitivity for a target sound is decreased by a spectrally remote interfering sound with zero interaural differences).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFLower interaural coherence in off-signal bands impairs binaural detection.
J Acoust Soc Am
June 2022
Department für Medizinische Physik und Akustik, Universität Oldenburg, 26111 Oldenburg, Germany.
Differences in interaural phase configuration between a target and a masker can lead to substantial binaural unmasking. This effect is decreased for masking noises with an interaural time difference (ITD). Adding a second noise with an opposing ITD in most cases further reduces binaural unmasking.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!