Prospective Study on the Efficacy and Impact of Cascade Screening and Evaluation of Hereditary Angioedema (CaSE-HAE).

Background: Recommendations regarding family screening for hereditary angioedema (HAE) remain variable and mostly based on expert opinion. Studies evaluating its implementation and efficacy are lacking.

Objectives: A novel HAE screening program was established to evaluate the efficacy and impact of cascade family screening (CFS) for at-risk relatives.

Methods: Potential HAE relatives were screened through the CFS approach. Prospective data on clinical, psychological, and HAE-related outcomes were collected at baseline and 1-year follow-up. Longitudinal outcomes were analyzed and compared between index patients and those given a diagnosis through CFS.

Results: Of 179 relatives, 53% were contactable, 67% of whom consented to screening. Twenty-nine patients (46%) were newly given the diagnosis of HAE; half were symptomatic at baseline (52%). There was a stronger trend toward higher diagnostic yield among first-degree families, although this did not meet statistical significance (57.6% vs 33.3%; P = .077). Among symptomatic patients, there was a higher proportion with complete annual HAE remission (15% vs 46%; P = .021) and a reduction in annual HAE-related hospital admissions (1 vs 0; P = .016) and length of stay (3 vs 2 days; P = .001) after 1 year. Among all patients, there were reduced Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-anxiety (14.35 ± 6.32 vs 6.47 ± 4.14; P = .001) and improved Angioedema Quality of Life scores (55% vs 35%; P < .001). By extrapolation, CFS led to a reduction of at least HK $1,200 (US $153) in HAE-related costs per patient per year. Screening using a greater than suggested C4 cutoff of 22.9 mg/dL yielded superior sensitivity (100%) and specificity (77%).

Conclusion: Cascade family screening is an effective approach to family screening in HAE, improving clinical and psychological outcomes, and reducing disease-related costs.