Objective: The aim of this study was to review out-of-hospital use of intranasal diazepam and midazolam for treatment of acute repetitive seizures (ARS) at a typical adult epilepsy center.
Methods: Data were collected through chart review and by telephone calls to either the patient or the caregiver regarding drug effectiveness, overall satisfaction, and adverse events.
Results: We identified 96 patients who were prescribed either benzodiazepine. Thirty-nine patients in the diazepam group and 38 patients in the midazolam group were able to be contacted and were included in the study. Sixty-two percent of patients in the diazepam group and 55% of patients in the midazolam group had used the medication at the time of data collection. Of these patients, 83% of patients in the diazepam group and 85% of patients in the midazolam group reported cessation of seizures after either the first or second dose. In comparison of the average patient satisfaction between intranasal diazepam and midazolam, there was no statistical significance (4.25 ± 1.22 vs 3.95 ± 1.35; p = 0.42). Adverse events were minor, included fatigue, nasal discomfort, headache, and dizziness.
Discussion: The use of the two new intranasal benzodiazepines was roughly divided equally. Slightly more than half of the patients who were prescribed the medication had used it. The overall satisfaction of the two medications was comparable. These findings highlight the principal usability of intranasal diazepam and midazolam in adults with ARS.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.yebeh.2022.108867 | DOI Listing |
Epilepsy Behav
December 2024
Division of Pediatric Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, Boston Medical Center, The Boston University Chobanian and Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Medicine (Baltimore)
August 2024
Department of Pharmacy, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Background: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of rectal chloral hydrate (CH) in pediatric procedural sedation.
Methods: Seven electronic databases and 3 clinical trials registry platforms were searched, and the deadline was August 2022. Randomized controlled trials evaluating the efficacy and safety of rectal CH in pediatric procedural sedation were included by 2 reviewers.
CJEM
September 2024
Division of Paediatric Emergency Medicine, Department of Paediatrics, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
Objectives: Intranasal (IN) midazolam is the most common anxiolytic for children in the emergency department (ED), but evidence of benefit is conflicting. We synthesized the evidence on IN midazolam for procedural distress in children undergoing ED painful procedures.
Methods: We included trials involving painful ED procedures in children 0-18 years involving IN midazolam.
Epilepsy Behav
October 2024
Clinical Development and Medical Affairs, Neurelis, Inc., 3430 Carmel Mountain Rd Suite 300, San Diego, CA 92121, USA; Department of Family Medicine, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawaii, 651 Ilalo St, Honolulu, HI 96813, USA. Electronic address:
Background: Benzodiazepines are used in first-line rescue therapy as immediate-use seizure medication for the treatment of seizure clusters and prolonged seizures. Their use varies across clinical practices and conditions, and they can be used promptly when indicated. Clinical studies have demonstrated seizure termination within 2 min when diazepam nasal spray is used to treat seizure clusters within 5 min, but the response when treating longer duration seizures in a cluster remains to be characterized.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFFront Neurol
May 2024
John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI, United States.
Introduction: Neurologic circadian influences, including sleep/wake transitions, processes (e.g., hormonal variation), and behavioral patterns (e.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!