Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Background: Effective prognostic assessment and appropriate drug selection are important for the clinical management of pancreatic cancer (PaC). Here, we aimed to establish a pyroptosis-associated genes (PRGs) signature to predict the prognostic outcomes of PaC and guide clinical drug therapy.
Methods: We identified the differentially expressed PRGs between pancreatic adenocarcinoma (n = 178) and control pancreas samples (n = 171) obtained from different databases, and performed Lasso and Cox regression analysis to create a prognosis signature. Kaplan-Meier (K-M) survival curves and time-dependent receiver operating characteristics were further constructed to assess the utility of the risk model. The International Cancer Genome Consortium (ICGC) PACA-AU cohort (n = 95) was used as a validation dataset to examine the validity of this prognostic model. The correlations of risk score (RS) with clinical features, immune cell infiltration, tumor mutation burden and half-maximal inhibitory concentrations (IC50) of chemotherapeutic drugs were analyzed, and the expression levels of PRGs in cell lines were detected.
Results: A prognostic signature was constructed, which consisted of 4 PRGs (AIM2, IL18, GSMDC and PLCG1). K-M analysis demonstrated a remarkable difference in overall survival (OS) time between low-risk (LR) and high-risk (HR) groups (P < 0.001). The RS contributed to the progression of PaC, and could be a significant independent factor for prognostic prediction. The validation of the ICGC cohort confirmed the effectiveness of the proposed signature. The patients with a HR score in the TCGA cohort had higher tumor mutation burden and more sensitivity to paclitaxel, gemcitabine, 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin than those with a LR score. The differential expression levels of signature genes were verified in vitro.
Conclusion: The PRGs signature can be applied for predicting the prognosis of PaC, and may provide useful information for selection of therapeutic drugs.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9356741 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S369209 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!