AI Article Synopsis

  • Advanced nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC) poses a significant public health issue, and the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has changed how these cases are managed.
  • A survey of U.S. dermatologists revealed a low average knowledge score of 40.6 out of 100 regarding ICI therapies, with 71% expressing a desire for more information about treating metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (mcSCC) and locally advanced basal cell carcinoma (laBCC).
  • A notable referral pattern was identified, with the majority of referrals for mcSCC or laBCC going to Mohs surgeons, indicating gaps in dermatologists' understanding and treatment options in this area.

Article Abstract

Background: Advanced nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC) is a sometimes unrecognized public health burden. The development of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), such as those affecting programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1), have dramatically changed the management of advanced NMSC. Dermatologists need to be knowledgeable about these therapies given their key role in diagnosing, treating, and comanaging NMSC. The purpose of this study was to assess the knowledge base and identify knowledge gaps that dermatologists may have regarding ICIs and assess advanced NMSC referral patterns.

Methods: A 10-question survey was emailed to United States-based dermatologists in July 2021 assessing knowledge of ICI therapy and referral patterns for metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (mcSCC) or locally advanced basal cell carcinoma (laBCC) management.

Results: At their current knowledge level, respondents averaged 40.6 out of 100 (95% CI [35.1, 46.0]) when asked how comfortable they feel counseling a patient on the risks and benefits of an ICI. Seventy-one percent reported that having more information about treatment for mcSCC or laBCC would be helpful in their practice. Being in practice for less than 10 years was not significantly associated with desiring more information about treatment. The respondents reported that the highest number of annual average referrals out for mcSCC or laBCC were made to Mohs surgeons. Fifty-four percent of respondents received referrals for mcSCC or laBCC, and of the providers receiving referrals, 40 percent of them came from general dermatology.

Conclusion: These results demonstrate that a knowledge gap exists for dermatologists in treating mcSCC and laBCC with immunotherapy. There is a need among all dermatologists, regardless of years in practice, to receive this information.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9345190PMC

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

mcscc labcc
16
knowledge gaps
8
gaps dermatologists
8
skin cancer
8
advanced nmsc
8
cell carcinoma
8
referrals mcscc
8
knowledge
6
dermatologists
6
mcscc
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!