AI Article Synopsis

  • The systematic review assessed the effectiveness of psychological interventions for men with chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS), highlighting a gap in treatment focus that primarily addresses physical therapies over psychological approaches.
  • A total of 4,503 studies were screened, resulting in seven studies that met criteria, predominantly showing that cognitive therapies were effective, but all studies had significant bias, affecting the reliability of the results.
  • While the findings suggest promise for psychological treatments, there is a critical need for more rigorous research to better evaluate their efficacy and application for men with CP/CPPS.

Article Abstract

Objectives: Chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS) is a complex condition. Despite recommendations for the inclusion of non-pharmacological treatment in the management of CP/CPPS, the focus has predominantly been on the inclusion of physical therapies with minimal discussion of psychological interventions. Therefore, this systematic review aimed to evaluate peer-reviewed studies of psychological interventions for men with CP/CPPS to determine their therapeutic efficacy and quality of intervention.

Methods: The review was registered in PROSPERO and based on PRISMA 2020 protocol. The systematic literature search was conducted in six databases. Quantitative studies of psychological intervention for adult men with CP/CPPS that provided outcome measures of pain, quality of life and/or psychological symptoms were reviewed. The Oxford level of evidence and Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies developed by the Effective Public Health Practice were employed.

Results: A total of 4,503 studies were reviewed; seven met the inclusion criteria. The included studies were randomised controlled trials, cohort, repeated measures, and case-series studies, with most including combined treatment for CP/CPPS. Cognitive therapy, cognitive behavioural therapy, or paradoxical relaxation training were found to be effective. However, high risks of bias were found in all included studies, limiting the generalisability and reliability of findings.

Conclusions: Evidence is preliminary but shows promise for psychological treatment either as a combined or standalone treatment for CP/CPPS. However, there is a need to develop research with a more rigorous methodology to evaluate psychological treatments for men with CP/CPPS.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/sjpain-2022-0049DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

men cp/cpps
12
chronic prostatitis/chronic
8
prostatitis/chronic pelvic
8
pelvic pain
8
pain syndrome
8
cp/cpps
8
syndrome cp/cpps
8
systematic review
8
psychological interventions
8
studies psychological
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!