AI Article Synopsis

  • Identifying endometriotic lesions is essential for preoperative planning, highlighting the need for better MRI techniques to enhance diagnostic accuracy for pelvic endometriosis.
  • A study involving 46 patients assessed the effectiveness of an MRI method called R2* multiple fast gradient recalled echo (MFGRE), finding it significantly improved diagnostic sensitivity for ovarian endometriomas (OMAs) and deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) compared to routine MRI alone.
  • Results showed that routine MRI had a sensitivity of 87.2% for OMAs and 46.7% for DIE, while the combination with R2*MFGRE achieved 100% for OMAs and 90% for DIE

Article Abstract

Background: Identifying and locating endometriotic lesions is crucial for preoperative planning, so new magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques are urgently needed to improve the diagnostic sensitivity for pelvic endometriosis.

Purpose: To evaluate the feasibility of R2* multiple fast gradient recalled echo (MFGRE) imaging in the diagnosis of pelvic endometriosis.

Material And Methods: A total of 46 patients with suspected endometriosis underwent routine pelvic MRI and R2*MFGRE imaging. Clinical diagnosis was pathologically confirmed one month after MRI examination. Three radiologists who were blinded to the pathological results evaluated the number of ovarian endometriomas (OMAs) and deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) lesions using routine MRI and its combination with R2*MFGRE. The diagnostic sensitivity for OMA or DIE using the two examination methods was determined. Two-correlation sample rank-sum tests were used to compare both methods. Additionally, for all lesions, the R2* values were measured and statistically analyzed.

Results: Among 46 patients, 47 OMAs and 30 DIE lesions were found surgically and pathologically confirmed. The diagnostic sensitivity of the routine MRI was 87.2% for OMA and 46.7% for DIE. The diagnostic sensitivity of the routine imaging combined with R2*MFGRE was 100% for OMA and 90% for DIE. The two-correlation sample rank-sum test showed a significant difference between both methods <0.01, z = -4.26). The median R2* value was 25.20 (IQR=14) for the OMA group, and 45.21 (IQR=40) for the DIE group. The difference between both groups was statistically significant (<0.01, z = -4.89).

Conclusion: R2*MFGRE imaging, as a supplement to the routine MRI, could improve the diagnostic sensitivity for pelvic endometriosis, especially for DIE.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/02841851221117260DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

diagnostic sensitivity
16
diagnosis pelvic
8
magnetic resonance
8
resonance imaging
8
pathologically confirmed
8
die lesions
8
routine mri
8
two-correlation sample
8
sample rank-sum
8
sensitivity routine
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!