AI Article Synopsis

  • A study was conducted to assess the impact of combining pulmonary rehabilitation with diaphragm pacemaker therapy on diaphragm function in patients who are severely ill and on mechanical ventilation.
  • 40 patients were split into two groups: one received standard care (control group), while the other (experimental group) received additional diaphragm pacemaker therapy along with standard care.
  • Results showed that after 30 days, the experimental group had more significant improvements in health indicators and shorter hospital stays compared to the control group, with no adverse events reported.

Article Abstract

To investigate the effect of pulmonary rehabilitation combined with diaphragm pacemaker therapy on the diaphragm function of severely ill patients on mechanical ventilation. Forty patients were randomly divided into the control group (CG; n = 20) and experimental group (EG; n = 20). The CG was given basic ICU nursing and conventional rehabilitation treatment. The EG added a diaphragm pacemaker and pulmonary rehabilitation therapies along with basic ICU nursing and conventional rehabilitation treatment. The relevant indexes were compared at baseline and postintervention, including the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), Acute Physiology, Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) scores, diaphragm mobility and thickness. The indexes of mechanical ventilation time, ICU and total hospital stays were compared between the two groups. There was no difference in the GCS and APACHE II scores, and diaphragm mobility and thickness between the two groups before treatment (P > 0.05). After 30 days of treatment, the GCS scores increased in both groups, the APACHE II scores decreased significantly, and diaphragm mobility and thickness decreased compared with before treatment (P < 0.05), but the improvement of each index in the EG was more evident than in the CG. Compared with the CG, the indexes of the EG, including offline, ICU and total hospitalization times, were significantly shorter (P < 0.05). Additionally, there were no adverse events such as accidental tube detachment or falling out of bed during treatment. Pulmonary rehabilitation combined with a diaphragm pacemaker is safe and effective in treating severely ill mechanically ventilated patients.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MRR.0000000000000535DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

pulmonary rehabilitation
16
diaphragm pacemaker
16
rehabilitation combined
12
combined diaphragm
12
severely ill
12
mechanical ventilation
12
apache scores
12
diaphragm mobility
12
mobility thickness
12
diaphragm
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!