Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
To explore the impact of open straw burning on air quality in the Yangtze River Delta (YRD) and surrounding areas, three key cities in the YRD, namely Hefei, Nanjing, and Shanghai, were selected to observe changes in aerosol characteristics. Based on Multi-AXis Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy (MAX-DOAS) observations from May to June 2021, the spatial-temporal distribution and potential sources of aerosol were studied. During the observation period, aerosol optical depth (AOD) in Shanghai was 55.15 % and 29.50 % higher than that in Hefei and Nanjing, respectively. For Shanghai, aerosols accumulated at night, and the aerosol extinction could reach 1.3 km in the morning. The aerosol variations in Hefei and Nanjing were consistent due to the relative conformity of the surrounding environmental conditions (R = 0.84). The vertical distribution of aerosol in all three cities had the same Gaussian shape. The aerosol lifted layers in Nanjing and Shanghai were higher than that in Hefei, with heights of 0.2-0.8 km and 0.2-0.6 km, respectively. The averaged aerosol extinctions for these two cities were 0.34 km and 0.49 km, respectively. Pollution source analysis was conducted based on wind field trajectory, satellite observation, and model simulation, taking Hefei as the recipient. The results showed that western Shandong Province, northern Anhui Province, northern Jiangxi Province, central Jiangsu Province, and the central YRD were the most important aerosols sources for Hefei. The contributions of central and southern Jiangsu Province were significantly higher than those of other potential sources, with a WCWT (Meteoinfo concentration weight trajectory) between 1.2 and 3.0. The influence of fine particles produced by open biomass burning inside the YRD was significantly higher than that outside the region (outside contribution: 36.6 %). Regarding the influence between YRD cities, more aerosols were transported from Shanghai to Hefei and Nanjing, with similar transport contributions between Nanjing and Hefei.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157749 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!