AI Article Synopsis

  • The study investigates how using medication samples of anti-VEGF agents affects future treatment choices in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nvAMD) while waiting for prior authorizations.
  • Researchers compared nvAMD patients who received sample medications (ranibizumab or aflibercept) with those who did not to assess the impact on drug selection and visual outcomes over time.
  • Results showed high adherence to initial medication choices in both groups, with significantly lower usage of bevacizumab and higher usage of aflibercept among those who received samples across multiple injections and at one-year follow-up.

Article Abstract

Purpose: Medication samples of anti-VEGF agents can represent a good option for retina specialists to provide timely treatment for newly converted neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nvAMD) while prior-authorizations (PA) are pending. Our study examines the effect of medication sample use (ranibizumab or aflibercept) on future anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agent selection in nvAMD.

Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Participants: nvAMD patients who underwent an initial anti-VEGF injection with a sample medication were compared to nvAMD control patients who never received a medication sample.

Methods: Charts from 2017 through 2020 were reviewed for data regarding demographics, anti-VEGF agent selection, and visual acuity outcomes for both groups. The utilization of different anti-VEGF agents in each group was compared at various time points using chi-square tests for independence of proportions.

Main Outcome Measures: Anti-VEGF agent selection for the first four injections and at one year were examined.

Results: Adherence to the initial agent was high between first and subsequent injections (2, 3, 4 injection, and 1 year) in sample (96.2%, 95.9%, 91.9%, 93.4%, respectively), and control groups (98.1%, 94.2%, 94.9%, 87.8%, respectively). Bevacizumab usage was significantly lower among eyes receiving samples relative to controls at the second (1.9% vs. 38.7%, p < .001), third (3.1% vs. 41.3%, p < .001), fourth injections (4.7% vs. 40.4%, p < .001), and at 1 year (0% vs. 33.8%, p < .001). Aflibercept usage was significantly higher in sample eyes relative to controls at the second (78.3% vs. 43.4%, p < .001), third (76.3% vs. 41.5%, p < .001), and fourth injections (76.7% vs. 43.4%, p < .001), and at 1 year (77.0% vs. 52.7%, p < .001).

Conclusions: Sample medications in nvAMD may be initiated for many reasons, including awaiting PA approval. Our study found that eyes receiving a sample anti-VEGF agent (ranibizumab or aflibercept) for their initial injection were less likely to receive bevacizumab at future visits relative to eyes that did not receive an anti-VEGF sample, even after one year of treatment. Given the persistent use of more expensive medications at subsequent injections for patients who were initiated on samples, insurance payors may consider waiving PA requirements for bevacizumab to avoid a paradoxical increase in health-care costs.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08820538.2022.2107398DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

agent selection
16
anti-vegf agent
12
sample medication
8
neovascular age-related
8
age-related macular
8
macular degeneration
8
anti-vegf agents
8
anti-vegf
6
agent
5
sample
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!