AI Article Synopsis

  • The study investigates mortality rates and timelines among patients who underwent full mouth extractions (FMEs) due to oral health issues, analyzing risk factors related to these deaths.
  • Conducted at the University of Cincinnati Medical Center, the research included 1,829 patients, focusing on various demographics, medical histories, and insurance statuses.
  • Of the patients studied, 9.3% died by the end of 2019, with significant mortality risk linked to factors such as age, high ASA scores, nursing home residency, and existing liver and oncological diseases.

Article Abstract

Purpose: When providers are forced to address the growing oral healthcare needs of an aging and sick population, full mouth extractions (FMEs) are often sought as a solution. The purpose of this observational study was to evaluate mortality rates, mortality timeline, and to identify associated risk factors.

Methods: A single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted at the University of Cincinnati Medical Center. All patients who underwent FMEs at the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery clinic from July 1, 2012 to December 31, 2019 due to caries or periodontal disease were included. Predictor variables recorded included a medical history, social history, and patient demographics. The main outcome variable was post-FME death, including the elapsed time from procedure to death. Deaths were identified using the National Death Index. Data were analyzed using simple descriptive statistics and Cox proportional hazard models. Deceased FME patients were compared to living FME patients to identify potential risk factors. Mortality risk index was derived from multivariable logistic regression.

Results: One thousand eight hundred twenty nine patients were included in the study. Nine hundred seventy six were female with a median age of 49 years (interquartile range 38-58). One thousand seven hundred nine were diagnosed with more than 1 comorbidity and 89% were on medicaid or medicare insurance. One hundred seventy patients (9.3%) were identified as deceased as of December 31, 2019. Of those who died, 87 patients were deceased within 2 years of the procedure and 147 within 5 years of the procedure. Statistically significant factors associated with mortality (P value < .01) included age (hazards ratio [HR] 1.01, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.03), ASA score >3 (HR 3.12, 95% CI 2.2-4.42), nursing home residence (HR 2.66, 95% 1.67-4.28), hepatic disease (HR 1.81, 95% CI 1.18-2.78), and oncologic disease (HR 1.91, 95% 1.32-2.77).

Conclusions: Approximately 1 in 10 patients died within 5 years of FME at our center. These patients may be medically and socially compromised. More research is needed to develop FME-specific mortality indices, which may serve useful for clinical decision-making and surgical palliative care.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2022.06.024DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

full mouth
8
medical center
8
patients
8
center patients
8
december 2019
8
fme patients
8
mortality
6
95%
5
mouth extraction
4
extraction patients?
4

Similar Publications

The purpose of this case report is to examine the management of vestibular bone fenestration during alveolar socket preservation using the Periosteal Inhibition (PI) approach. Here, for the first time, the PI technique, which has been shown to be successful in maintaining intact cortical bone, is examined in the context of a bone defect. : After an atraumatic extraction of a damaged tooth, a vestibular bone fenestration was discovered in the 62-year-old male patient.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Fracture Resistance of Chairside CAD/CAM Lithium Disilicate Partial and Full Coverage Crowns and Veneers for Maxillary Canines.

Oper Dent

January 2025

Nathaniel C Lawson, DDS, PhD, director of Master of Science in Dental Biomaterials program and associate professor, Department of Clinical and Community Sciences, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Dentistry, Birmingham, AL, USA.

Objective: This study aimed to assess the fracture resistance of chairside computer assisted design and computer assisted manufacturing (CAD-CAM) lithium disilicate partial and full-coverage crowns and veneers for maxillary canines.

Methods And Materials: Forty-eight restorations for maxillary right canines (12 per group) were designed as follows: (1) partial crown with finish line in the upper middle third; (2) partial crown with finish line in the lower middle third; (3) traditional labial veneer; and (4) traditional full-coverage crown. Restorations were fabricated out of lithium disilicate (Amber Mill, Hassbio) using a chairside CAD-CAM system (Cerec Dentsply Sirona).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Therapeutic extraction of second molars in orthodontics: a scoping review.

BMC Oral Health

January 2025

Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University, Mansoura, 35516, Egypt.

Objective: To review the literature to identify the present evidence on the extraction of second molars in orthodontics.

Materials & Method: A search of the MEDLINE/PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science™, and ProQuest databases for full-text articles was done on March 5, 2024. The search went back till the 1st of January 1991 and was limited to articles in English.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Considering the significant participation of the microenvironment in the local aggressiveness of odontogenic keratocysts, this study aims to evaluate the expression of ADAMTS-1 and its substrates, versican, aggrecan and brevican in this locally invasive odontogenic cyst.

Methods: Immunohistochemistry and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) were conducted on 30 cases of odontogenic keratocysts (OKCs) and 20 dental follicles (DFs).

Results: The immunohistochemical expression of these proteins was predominantly cytoplasmic and granular across all samples.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical performance (degree of trueness) of a novel scan body "tooth-modified Scan body" (TMSB)& conventional scan body (CSB) in implant-supported full arch screw retained cases.

Methods: Seven edentulous arches (two maxillae, five mandibles) in 6 patients were rehabilitated with monolithic zirconia screw-retained implant prostheses supported by 4 (n = 1) and 5 implants (n = 6) for a total amount of 34 implants. Implant locations were scanned by intra-oral scanner (IOS) using two types of scan bodies, conventional scan bodies (CSB) in group (1) and tooth-modified scan bodies (TMSB) in group (2).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!