A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 144

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 144
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 212
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3106
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Use of Microballoon Catheter in Transarterial Ethanol Embolization of Renal Angiomyolipoma: A Retrospective Comparative Study with Historical Control? | LitMetric

Purpose: To clarify the utility of microballoon catheter in renal arterial ethanol embolization of renal angiomyolipoma (AML).

Material And Methods: A total of 20 patients (15 women, 5 men) with median age of 45 years (39-60 years) underwent embolization to treat 22 AMLs. A mixture of ethanol and iodized oil was injected into the feeding arteries of 13 tumors using balloon occlusion (the balloon embolization group) with a microballoon catheter and 9 tumors without using balloon occlusion (the non-balloon embolization group). Changes in the maximum tumor diameter, tumor volume, and adverse events were evaluated.

Result: The median baseline maximum tumor diameters and volumes were 6.3 cm and 61.4 cm in the balloon embolization group, and 4.6 cm and 40.1 cm in the non-balloon embolization group, respectively. Tumor enhancement disappeared on postembolization angiography in all cases. All tumors shrunk after embolization. There were no statistically significant differences in the percent decrease in the maximum tumor diameter and volume at 10-12 month between balloon occlusion group (31.5% and 67.9%) and control group (34.8% and 62.6%). Fever was significantly more frequent when balloon occlusion was used: 38% vs. 0% ( = 0.03). No major complication was observed in either patient group.

Conclusions: Balloon occlusion may not affect tumor shrinkage when embolizing AMLs with a mixture of ethanol and lipiodol.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9327327PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.22575/interventionalradiology.2020-0036DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

balloon occlusion
20
embolization group
16
microballoon catheter
12
maximum tumor
12
embolization
8
ethanol embolization
8
embolization renal
8
renal angiomyolipoma
8
amls mixture
8
mixture ethanol
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!