Introduction: False-positive inconclusive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) results against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 were not low and have potentially harmful effects. We aimed to find parameters to differentiate positive cases from false-positive ones, and suggest an optimal scheme and follow-up period for inconclusive results.

Methods: Cases with inconclusive PCR tests among healthcare personnel from February 2020 to June 2021 were classified as confirmed positive, clinically positive, and clinically negative groups, which were compared. The diagnostic accuracy of follow-up tests and composites of clinical and laboratory data were analyzed.

Results: Symptoms, contact history, and lower cycle threshold of the N gene were more common in the COVID-19 positive group. The scoring schemes combining symptom and contact history with follow-up PCR results had higher sensitivities than the PCR tests only modality. Follow-up tests up to 5 days combined with symptoms and contact history could discriminate between positive and negative cases.

Conclusion: A follow-up PCR test up to day 5 with clinical features might predict positivity and shorten the quarantine period in most healthcare personnel.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9308491PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcvp.2022.100100DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

contact history
12
day clinical
8
clinical features
8
pcr tests
8
healthcare personnel
8
positive clinically
8
follow-up tests
8
symptoms contact
8
follow-up pcr
8
follow-up
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!