Background: Prior studies on revascularization prior to transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), in patients with significant coronary artery disease (CAD), have reported mixed results.
Aim: We sought to perform a meta-analysis combining current evidence by investigating outcomes of revascularization in patients who undergo TAVR with coexisting CAD.
Methods: We searched literature for studies reporting on outcomes following TAVR performed with versus without pre-TAVR PCI, for coexisting CAD. Random-effect model was used to pool estimates of odds ratios (ORs).
Results: Twenty-four reports with 12,182 TAVR patients were included: 22 observational and 2 clinical trials. 4,110 (33.7%) were in the pre-TAVR PCI group, 51.4% were females, and mean age was 81.9 years. The 30-day mortality was 5.2% versus 5.0% in patients with versus without pre-TAVR PCI, respectively [OR= 1.19 (95% CI: 0.91-1.55, P= 0.20)]. Pooled 1-year mortality was 18.1% versus 19.1% in patients with versus without pre-TAVR PCI (OR= 1.12, 95% CI: 0.95-1.31, P= 0.61). There was no significant difference between the groups for myocardial infarction, stroke, acute kidney injury, pacemaker implantation, or re-hospitalization. Pre-TAVR PCI was associated with an increased risk of life-threatening bleeding at 30 days.
Conclusion: Pre-TAVR revascularization with PCI was not associated with improved 30-day or 1-year mortality; however, it was associated with an increased risk of life-threatening bleeding at 30-day post-TAVR. Our results do not support routine revascularization with PCI prior to TAVR with coexisting CAD. Future trials addressing anatomical complexity and symptom burden may help better risk stratify patients who may benefit from pre-TAVR revascularization.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2022.101339 | DOI Listing |
J Clin Med
June 2024
Interventional Cardiology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, 98122 Messina, Italy.
The optimal timing to perform percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is not well established. In this meta-analysis, we aimed to compare the outcomes of patients undergoing PCI before versus after TAVR. A comprehensive literature search was performed including Medline, Embase, and Cochrane electronic databases up to 5 April 2024 for studies that compared PCI before and after TAVR reporting at least one clinical outcome of interest (PROSPERO ID: CRD42023470417).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFRev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed)
May 2024
Quebec Heart and Lung Institute, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada; Servicio de Cardiología, Institut Clínic Cardiovascular, Hospital Clínic, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi I Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain. Electronic address:
Introduction And Objectives: In patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the workup pre-transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), the clinical impact of coronary revascularization complexity remains unknown. This study sought to examine the impact of PCI complexity on clinical outcomes after TAVR in patients undergoing PCI in the preprocedural workup.
Methods: This was a multicenter study including consecutive patients scheduled for TAVR with concomitant significant coronary artery disease.
Front Cardiovasc Med
February 2024
Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, Krems, Austria.
Background: Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a common finding in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). However, the impact on prognosis of chronic total occlusions (CTOs), a drastic expression of CAD, remains unclear.
Methods And Results: We retrospectively reviewed 1,487 consecutive TAVR cases performed at a single tertiary care medical center.
Coron Artery Dis
November 2023
Department of Medicine, University of Vermont Larner College of Medicine.
Objectives: Prolonged wait times for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are associated with increased morbidity and mortality. The incidence and predictors of short TAVR wait times (STWT: defined as ≤ 30 days from referral to TAVR procedure) have not been defined. This study examined the impact of clinical characteristics, demographics, and pre-TAVR cardiac catheterization on wait times for TAVR.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAm J Cardiol
November 2023
Department of Cardiology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire. Electronic address:
There is inadequate evidence regarding the role of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). The current American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology guidelines are limited to class 2A recommendations for pre-TAVR revascularization in the setting of hemodynamically significant left main (LM), proximal left anterior descending (pLAD), or extensive bifurcation disease regardless of angina status. We performed a multicenter, retrospective, observational study assessing the benefit of PCI in patients with coronary artery disease who underwent transfemoral TAVR for severe symptomatic aortic stenosis.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!