A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Radiography education with VR using head mounted display: proficiency evaluation by rubric method. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study investigates the effectiveness of HMD-based virtual reality coaching systems (HMD-VRC) for teaching radiography skills, noting that previous evaluations relied solely on questionnaires.
  • It involved 30 first-year radiology students in Japan, comparing those trained with HMD-VRC to those using traditional equipment, leading to mixed results in skill proficiency.
  • The findings indicate that while some skills were comparable, there was a significant drop in proficiency related to palpation and patient interaction, suggesting HMD-VRC may be less effective than hands-on training in certain areas.

Article Abstract

Background: The use of head mounted display (HMD)-based immersive virtual reality (VR) coaching systems (HMD-VRC) is expected to be effective for skill acquisition in radiography. The usefulness of HMD-VRC has been reported in many previous studies. However, previous studies have evaluated the effectiveness of HMD-VRC only through questionnaires. HMD-VRC has difficulties in palpation and patient interaction compared to real-world training. It is expected that these issues will have an impact on proficiency. The purpose of this study is to determine the impact of VR constraints in HMD-VRC, especially palpation and patient interaction, on radiographic skills proficiency in a real-world setting.

Methods: First-year students (n = 30) at a training school for radiology technologists in Japan were randomly divided into two groups, one using HMD-VRC (HMD-VRC group) and the other practicing with conventional physical equipment (RP group) and trained for approximately one hour. The teachers then evaluated the students for proficiency using a rubric method.

Results: In this study, it was found that some skills in the HMD-VRC group were equivalent to those of the RP group and some were significantly lower than those of the RP group. There was a significant decrease in proficiency in skills related to palpation and patient interaction.

Conclusions: This study suggests that HMD-VRC can be less effective than real-world training in radiographic techniques, which require palpation and patient interaction. For effective training, it is important to objectively evaluate proficiency in the real world, even for HMD-VRC with new technologies, such as haptic presentation and VR patient interaction.

Trial Registration: The study was conducted with the approval of the Ethics Committee of International University of Health and Welfare (Approval No.21-Im-035, Registration date: September 28, 2021).

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9331594PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03645-8DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

palpation patient
16
patient interaction
12
hmd-vrc
10
head mounted
8
mounted display
8
previous studies
8
real-world training
8
hmd-vrc group
8
proficiency
6
patient
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!