COVID-19 vaccination intention and activation among health care system employees: A mixed methods study.

Vaccine

Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, NC, USA; Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA; Duke-Margolis Center for Health Policy, Durham, NC, USA.

Published: August 2022

AI Article Synopsis

  • High COVID-19 vaccination rates among health care employees are essential to prevent outbreaks, prompting a study to explore factors influencing vaccination intentions and decisions.
  • The research involved a cross-sectional survey and semi-structured interviews with employees from a VA health care system, gathering data on vaccination intentions, decisions, and barriers before and after vaccine distribution.
  • Results showed that 77% of employees initially wanted the vaccine, with five decision-making groups identified post-distribution, indicating varied levels of acceptance and hesitancy, particularly among Black and multi-racial employees.

Article Abstract

Background: Achieving high COVID-19 vaccination rates among employees is necessary to prevent outbreaks in health care settings. The goal of the study was to produce actionable and timely evidence about factors underlying the intention and decisions to obtain the COVID-19 vaccine by employees.

Methods: The study was conducted from December 2020 - May 2021 with employees from a VA health care system in Southeastern US. The study used a convergent mixed methods design comprising two main activities: a cross-sectional survey conducted prior to COVID-19 vaccine distribution, and semi-structured interviews conducted 4-6 months after vaccine distribution. Data were collected about participant characteristics, vaccination intention prior to distribution, vaccination decision post-distribution, determinants of vaccination intention and decision, activating factors, sources of information and intervention needs. Data from the survey and interviews were analyzed separately and integrated narratively in the discussion.

Results: Prior to vaccine distribution, 77% of employees wanted to be vaccinated. Post vaccine distribution, we identified 5 distinct decision-making groups: 1) vaccine believers who actively sought vaccination and included those sometimes described as "immunization advocates", 2) go along to get along (GATGA) individuals who got vaccinated but did not actively seek it, 3) cautious acceptors who got the COVID-19 vaccine after some delay, 4) fence sitters who remained uncertain about getting vaccinated, and 5) vaccine refusers who actively rejected the COVID-19 vaccine. Participants identifying with Black or multiple races were more likely to express hesitancy in their vaccination intention.

Conclusion: The findings of our study highlight distinct decision-making profiles associated with COVID-19 vaccination among employees of a VA health care system, and provide tailored recommendations to reduce vaccine hesitancy in this population.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9276645PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.07.010DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

health care
16
covid-19 vaccine
16
vaccine distribution
16
covid-19 vaccination
12
vaccination intention
12
care system
12
vaccine
10
mixed methods
8
employees health
8
distinct decision-making
8

Similar Publications

Rural and remote health care: the case for spatial justice.

Rural Remote Health

January 2025

School of Health Sciences, Western Sydney University, Campbelltown, NSW 2560, Australia.

Almost universally, people living in rural and remote places die younger, poorer, and sicker than urban-dwelling citizens of the same country. Despite clear need, health services are commonly less available, and more costly and challenging to access, for rural and remote people. Rural geography is commonly cited as a reason for these disparities, that is, rural people are said to live in places too distant, too underpopulated, and too difficult to access.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Effects of Noise and Public Setting on Blood Pressure Readings : A Randomized Crossover Trial.

Ann Intern Med

January 2025

Department of Epidemiology and Welch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology, and Clinical Research, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore; and Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland (T.M.B.).

Background: Guidelines emphasize quiet settings for blood pressure (BP) measurement.

Objective: To determine the effect of noise and public environment on BP readings.

Design: Randomized crossover trial of adults in Baltimore, Maryland.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: With the increasing implementation of patient online record access (ORA), various approaches to access to minors' electronic health records have been adopted globally. In Sweden, the current regulatory framework restricts ORA for minors and their guardians when the minor is aged between 13 and 15 years. Families of adolescents with complex health care needs often desire health information to manage their child's care and involve them in their care.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Advancements in mobile technology have paved the way for innovative interventions aimed at promoting physical activity (PA).

Objective: The main objective of this feasibility study was to assess the feasibility, usability, and acceptability of the More In Action (MIA) app, designed to promote PA among older adults. MIA offers 7 features: personalized tips, PA literacy, guided peer workouts, a community calendar, a personal activity diary, a progression monitor, and a chatbot.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!