Restrictivism, Abortion, and Organ Donation.

Camb Q Healthc Ethics

Park University, Dodge Community College, Parkville, Missouri, USA.

Published: July 2022

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0963180121001043DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

restrictivism abortion
4
abortion organ
4
organ donation
4
restrictivism
1
organ
1
donation
1

Similar Publications

What's Wrong with Restrictivism?

Camb Q Healthc Ethics

April 2024

Philosophy, Park University, Parkville, USA.

Emily Carroll and Parker Crutchfield propose a new inconsistency argument against abortion restrictivism. In response, I raised several objections to their argument. Recently Carroll and Crutchfield have replied and seem to be under the impression that I'm a restrictivist.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Most opponents of abortion (OA) believe fetuses . Critics argue that OA act inconsistently with regards to fetal life, seeking to restrict access to induced abortion, but largely ignoring spontaneous abortion and the creation of surplus embryos by IVF. Nicholas Colgrove, Bruce Blackshaw, and Daniel Rodger call such arguments and contend they do not They present three objections to these arguments - the other beliefs, other actions, and hypocrisy objection.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!