Estimating the risk of environmental contamination by forest users in African Swine Fever endemic areas.

Acta Vet Scand

Istituto Superiore per la Protezione e la Ricerca Ambientale, Via Ca' Fornacetta, 9, 40064, Ozzano Emilia, BO, Italy.

Published: July 2022

AI Article Synopsis

  • African Swine Fever (ASF) is a deadly viral disease affecting pigs, with no current vaccines or treatments available, and can be spread by humans via contaminated objects.
  • A simulation study examined how human activities in forests contribute to ASF contamination, revealing that while short-term risks appear low, the accumulation of activities over time can lead to thousands of contamination events annually.
  • High-risk activities like wild boar feeding and logging significantly increase contamination probabilities, highlighting the need for careful management to prevent ASF spread into pig farms.

Article Abstract

Background: African Swine Fever (ASF) is a highly lethal viral disease caused by the African Swine Fever Virus (ASFV), the only virus of the Asfaviridae family, which affects different species of wild and domestic suids, and for which no vaccination or effective medical treatment is currently available. The virus can survive for long periods in the environment, and humans can unintentionally act as vectors through infected fomites, a risk that is linked to the ASF introduction into pig farms. We ran a simulation study, in which we reconstructed the probability process leading to the different forms of human-mediated ASF contamination in ASF endemic areas. We compared the infection risks related to different types of human forest activities and produced estimates of the minimum expected number of human-induced contamination events occurring annually at the scale of some European countries.

Results: When analysed on a short temporal scale and in a relatively small spatial context, ASF environmental contamination appeared as a rather unlikely event for most of the simulated forest uses, with contamination probabilities often lower than 0.1%. When scaling up the contamination process to a whole year and to large geographic areas, though, the accumulation of the same forest activities, repeated several times per month within the same patch of forest, produced the expectation that thousands of contamination events would occur each year, with potentially relevant epidemiological consequences. Wild boar supplemental feeding and forest logging emerged as the riskiest activities in terms of contamination probabilities, but risk was highly influenced by the frequency and intensity of the different types of forest use.

Conclusions: The risk of human-mediated ASF environmental contamination should not be disregarded when planning management actions to reduce ASF circulation and prevent its breach into the pig farming system. Supplemental feeding should be strongly reduced or avoided in ASF affected areas. Wild boar hunting, which is often employed as an active management tool in ASF affected areas, should be seen as both a tool for controlling wild boar density and as a potential risk for further contamination. It is essential to implement and enforce strict biosecurity measures for all forest-based human activities in ASF endemic areas.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9327371PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13028-022-00636-zDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

environmental contamination
12
african swine
12
swine fever
12
endemic areas
12
wild boar
12
contamination
10
asf
10
human-mediated asf
8
asf endemic
8
forest activities
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!