[Short term results of the FLOT neoadjuvant therapy on the surgical management of advanced gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma].

Magy Seb

1 Szegedi Tudományegyetem Szent-Györgyi Albert Orvostudományi Kar, Sebészeti Klinika, Szeged, Magyarország (tanszékvezető: Prof. Dr. Lázár György).

Published: June 2022

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study discusses the shift in treatment for advanced gastro-oesophageal junction cancer, using neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery, focusing on two different chemotherapy regimens: ECF/ECX (Group I) and FLOT (Group II).
  • The research involved analyzing surgical outcomes, tumor regression, and side effects from these two chemotherapy protocols in patients with T2-T4 tumors over a specific time period.
  • Results indicated that the FLOT protocol led to a significantly higher number of complete tumor regressions compared to the older ECF/ECX treatment, though no major differences in surgical safety and side effects were observed between the two groups.

Article Abstract

Introduction. Recently the therapeutic treatment for advanced, stage T2-T4 gastro-oesophageal junction cancer and those adjacent to the regional lymph nodes involves neoadjuvant chemotherapy with subsequent surgical intervention. Method. Neoadjuvant oncological treatment for gastro-oesophageal junction cancer previously consisted of the intravenous administration of epirubicin, cisplatin and fluorouracil (ECF) or epirubicin, cisplatin and capecitabine (ECX) combination (Group I). In the course of the new protocol (FLOT-, F: 5-FU, L: leucovorin, O: oxaliplatin, T: docetaxel), patients were included with resectable gastro-oesophageal junction cancer who had a clinical-stage cT2 or higher nodal positive cN+ disease (Group II). Between 31st of December 2013 and 1st of June 2021 we retrospectively analyzed the effect of these FLOT oncological protocols in terms of surgical outcomes in cases of T2-T4 tumors (n = 9). We compared the results of the randomly assigned nine patients from earlier ECF/ECX protocol (Group I). We analyzed the effect of the different neoadjuvant therapy on tumor regression, and evaluated the types of possible side effects, type of surgery, and the oncological radicality of surgical procedures (number of removed regional lymph nodes, resection margins). Results. Comparing the two groups we found that in cases of FLOT neoadjuvant chemotherapy complete regression was achieved significantly a higher number like in earlier ECX/ECF therapy. Furthermore, the average number of removed lymph nodes, and the safety resection margins (distal, circumferential) no significant difference was found between the two groups. Neutropenia was the most frequently encountered side effect. Leukopenia, neutropenia and nausea occurred more frequently in cases of the old protocol (Group I). Conclusions. As a result of the FLOT neoadjuvant oncological protocol for advanced gastro-oesophageal junction cancer, the number of cases with complete tumor regression has significantly increased. The present results strongly suggest a significant advantage in favor of FLOT neoadjuvant treatment following surgery. The prevalence of side effects was also appreciably lower in cases of the FLOT protocol.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1556/1046.2022.20008DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

gastro-oesophageal junction
20
flot neoadjuvant
16
junction cancer
16
lymph nodes
12
neoadjuvant therapy
8
advanced gastro-oesophageal
8
regional lymph
8
neoadjuvant chemotherapy
8
neoadjuvant oncological
8
epirubicin cisplatin
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!