AI Article Synopsis
- The study aimed to assess how different types of footwear and testing environments affect the performance of the modified Balance Error Scoring System (mBESS) among middle school athletes aged 10 to 14.
- A total of 2,667 athletes participated, with their performance measured based on errors committed in different stances while wearing either shoes, cleats, or going barefoot and tested indoors or outdoors.
- Results indicated that athletes made significantly fewer errors in single-leg and tandem stances when wearing shoes and when tested indoors, suggesting that both footwear type and environment impact balance performance.
Article Abstract
Context: Limited evidence exists to demonstrate the effect of extrinsic factors, such as footwear worn or the testing environment, on performance of the modified balance error scoring system (mBESS) in the middle school age (10-14 y) population. Therefore, the purpose of our study was to investigate the effect of footwear types and testing environments on performance of the mBESS by middle school athletes.
Design: Cross-sectional.
Methods: In total, 2667 middle school athletes (55.9% boys and 44.1% girls; age = 12.3 [0.94] y) were administered the mBESS while wearing their self-selected footwear (barefoot, cleats, or shoes) either indoors (basketball court) or outdoors (football field or track). The number of errors committed (range = 0-10) during the double-leg, single-leg, and tandem stances of the mBESS were summed to calculate a total score (range = 0-30). Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to assess for differences among the footwear groups for each mBESS stance and the total score. Mann-Whitney U tests with calculated nonparametric effect sizes (r) were used to assess for differences between the footwear groups and testing environments when appropriate.
Results: There were significant differences for the number of committed errors among the footwear groups in the single-leg (P < .001) and tandem (P < .001) stances of the mBESS and mBESS total scores (P < .001). Significantly fewer errors (better) were committed while wearing shoes compared with other footwear in the single-leg and tandem stances of the mBESS (Ps ≤ .032, r = .07-.13). Participants assessed indoors committed significantly fewer errors than those assessed outdoors in each stance of the mBESS (Ps ≤ .022, r = .04-.14). Lower (better) mBESS total scores were observed for participants while wearing shoes (Ps ≤ .002, r = .10-.15) or assessed indoors (P = .001, r = .14).
Conclusions: Although our data suggest that the type of footwear worn and the testing environment have a significant effect on mBESS scores of middle school athletes, the magnitudes of these differences are negligible.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1123/jsr.2021-0396 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Internet-Based Dementia Prevention Intervention (DementiaRisk): Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial and Knowledge Translation.
JMIR Res Protoc
January 2025
McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Background: Research has shown that engaging in a range of healthy lifestyles or behavioral factors can help reduce the risk of developing dementia. Improved knowledge of modifiable risk factors for dementia may help engage people to reduce their risk, with beneficial impacts on individual and public health. Moreover, many guidelines emphasize the importance of providing education and web-based resources for dementia prevention.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFExploring the Psychological and Physiological Insights Through Digital Phenotyping by Analyzing the Discrepancies Between Subjective Insomnia Severity and Activity-Based Objective Sleep Measures: Observational Cohort Study.
JMIR Ment Health
January 2025
Department of Psychiatry, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Background: Insomnia is a prevalent sleep disorder affecting millions worldwide, with significant impacts on daily functioning and quality of life. While traditionally assessed through subjective measures such as the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), the advent of wearable technology has enabled continuous, objective sleep monitoring in natural environments. However, the relationship between subjective insomnia severity and objective sleep parameters remains unclear.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFMultimodal Pain Recognition in Postoperative Patients: Machine Learning Approach.
JMIR Form Res
January 2025
Department of Computer Science, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States.
Background: Acute pain management is critical in postoperative care, especially in vulnerable patient populations that may be unable to self-report pain levels effectively. Current methods of pain assessment often rely on subjective patient reports or behavioral pain observation tools, which can lead to inconsistencies in pain management. Multimodal pain assessment, integrating physiological and behavioral data, presents an opportunity to create more objective and accurate pain measurement systems.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnhancing Diagnostic Accuracy of Lung Nodules in Chest Computed Tomography Using Artificial Intelligence: Retrospective Analysis.
J Med Internet Res
January 2025
Department of Health Policy and Management, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Background: Uncertainty in the diagnosis of lung nodules is a challenge for both patients and physicians. Artificial intelligence (AI) systems are increasingly being integrated into medical imaging to assist diagnostic procedures. However, the accuracy of AI systems in identifying and measuring lung nodules on chest computed tomography (CT) scans remains unclear, which requires further evaluation.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEffectiveness of Frequent Point-of-Care Molecular COVID-19 Surveillance in a Rural Workplace: Nonrandomized Controlled Clinical Trial Among Miners.
JMIR Public Health Surveill
January 2025
Center for Global Health, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, NM, United States.
Background: Numerous studies have assessed the risk of SARS-CoV-2 exposure and infection among health care workers during the pandemic. However, far fewer studies have investigated the impact of SARS-CoV-2 on essential workers in other sectors. Moreover, guidance for maintaining a safely operating workplace in sectors outside of health care remains limited.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!