Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in diagnosis, staging, and treatment response assessment of multiple myeloma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Skeletal Radiol

Department of Radiology, Division Musculoskeletal Imaging and Intervention, University of Washington, UW Radiology-Roosevelt Clinic, 4245 Roosevelt Way NE, Box 354755, Seattle, WA, 98105, USA.

Published: March 2023

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study evaluates the effectiveness of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in diagnosing, staging, and assessing treatment response for multiple myeloma (MM).
  • A systematic review of 5,881 publications led to 33 studies being included in the analysis, which showed that DWI has a sensitivity of 86% and specificity of 63% for detecting MM.
  • The findings suggest that DWI is a valuable tool for diagnosing and monitoring MM, potentially allowing for quicker adjustments to treatment plans that can improve patient outcomes.

Article Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the role of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in the initial diagnosis, staging, and assessment of treatment response in patients with multiple myeloma (MM).

Materials And Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted in PubMed, the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. The primary endpoints were defined as the diagnostic performance of DWI for disease detection, staging of MM, and assessing response to treatment in these patients.

Results: Of 5881 initially reviewed publications, 33 were included in the final qualitative and quantitative meta-analysis. The diagnostic performance of DWI in the detection of patients with MM revealed pooled sensitivity and specificity of 86% (95% CI: 84-89) and 63% (95% CI: 56-70), respectively, with a diagnostic odds ratio (OR) of 14.98 (95% CI: 4.24-52.91). The pooled risk difference of 0.19 (95% CI: - 0.04-0.42) was reported in favor of upstaging with DWI compared to conventional MRI (P value = 0.1). Treatment response evaluation and ADC value changes across different studies showed sensitivity and specificity of approximately 78% (95% CI: 72-83) and 73% (95% CI: 61-83), respectively, with a diagnostic OR of 7.21 in distinguishing responders from non-responders.

Conclusions: DWI is not only a promising tool for the diagnosis of MM, but it is also useful in the initial staging and re-staging of the disease and treatment response assessment. This can aid clinicians with earlier initiation or change in treatment strategy, which could have prognostic significance for patients.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00256-022-04119-0DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

treatment response
16
diffusion-weighted imaging
8
imaging dwi
8
diagnosis staging
8
response assessment
8
multiple myeloma
8
diagnostic performance
8
performance dwi
8
sensitivity specificity
8
dwi
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!