Widely used in daily practice, handgrip strength (HGS) is a low cost, easy-to-use, and portable test to assess overall muscle and physical function. It can be used as a stand-alone or a first-line tool for evaluating muscle weakness, though controversy surrounds its use for assessing global or lower limb muscle function. Lower limb mobility and physical activity are reduced with advancing age. This decline is difficult to quantify with isokinetic or isometric devices in routine settings (hospital and nursing home). For this narrative review we explored and summarized the findings of studies that investigated the association between HGS, lower limb muscle strength, and physical performance in older adults. The review also provides directions for future research. We noted contrasting findings for an association between HGS, lower limb strength, and physical performance. We found insufficient evidence for endorsing the handgrip dynamometer as a definitive tool for measuring overall muscle strength and physical function. More evidence is needed from comparable studies involving larger samples of men and women and investigating other areas such as lifestyle, daily physical activity levels, and health-related disorders.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.exger.2022.111902 | DOI Listing |
J Orthop Traumatol
January 2025
Unità Operativa di Ortopedia e Traumatologia, APSS Trento, Largo Medaglie d'oro, 9, 38121, Trento, Italy.
Background: The Masquelet induced membrane technique is a surgical procedure that allows the reconstruction of segmental bone defects using a relatively simple approach that requires minimal resources from both the healthcare facility and the patient. Historically applied to the lower limb, this technique is gaining increasing attention in the literature for its use in the upper limb.
Methods: A systematic review of the literature was conducted using the PubMed and Google Scholar databases to identify all studies reporting the outcomes of the Masquelet induced membrane technique in the long bones of the upper limb (humerus, radius, and ulna) with a sample size of at least 3 patients.
Qual Life Res
January 2025
School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, 200 Lees Avenue (FHS), Ottawa, ON, K1N 6N5, Canada.
Purpose: Involving patients in developing patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) is essential for accurately capturing their perspectives. However, understanding how patients were involved in developing PROMs used after hip or knee arthroplasty is limited. This scoping review aimed to evaluate whether patients were involved in the development of these PROMs and how they were involved.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAm J Forensic Med Pathol
January 2025
From the Department of Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Pedestrian and bicyclist fatalities have increased over the past decade in the United States. Factors proposed to explain this increase include the increased popularity of larger passenger vehicles, road design to accommodate faster-moving traffic, and poor road infrastructure. We analyzed a series of 102 pedestrian and bicyclist fatalities to determine which factors were involved.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Orthop Sports Phys Ther
February 2025
This editorial draws an analogy between the literary genre of the 'whodunit' and the complexities of patellofemoral pain (PFP). Traditionally, PFP management has centered on biomechanical factors such as hip muscle weakness, foot pronation, and patellar tracking issues. However, long-term outcomes often remain unsatisfactory, highlighting the need for alternative strategies.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAm J Sports Med
January 2025
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Background: Timely recognition and addressing of concomitant cartilage damage at the time of meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT) is critical to warrant future success. However, there remains a scarcity of data comparing outcomes between MAT with and without cartilage procedures.
Purpose: To compare patient-reported outcomes and rates of complications, failures, reoperations, and graft survivorship after MAT with concomitant cartilage procedures (MAT/Cart) and MAT without (MAT/NoCart).
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!