AI Article Synopsis

  • The study compared the safety and effectiveness of apixaban replacement (AR) versus heparin bridging (HB) for patients on warfarin undergoing endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) for colorectal polyps.
  • Conducted in Japan, the trial aimed to enroll 160 patients but only 44 were included due to a shortage of eligible participants; these were randomly assigned to either AR or HB groups.
  • Results showed that AR had no postoperative bleeding incidents compared to 15% in HB, along with a significantly shorter hospital stay for AR patients, suggesting AR might be a safer alternative despite the trial's limited sample size.

Article Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of apixaban replacement (AR) as an alternative to heparin bridging (HB) in patients taking warfarin and scheduled for endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) in the colorectum.

Methods: This trial was conducted at seven institutes in Japan between May 2016 and May 2018. Enrolled patients had been taking oral warfarin and were diagnosed within 3 months with colorectal polyps for which EMR was indicated. Patients were randomly assigned to receive HB or AR. The primary endpoint was the incidence of postoperative bleeding. Secondary endpoints were the length of hospital stay, therapeutic endoscopy outcomes, and adverse events.

Results: The planned sample size was 160 patients, but due to a decrease in the number of patients taking warfarin, the target number of cases could not be achieved within the case enrollment period, 44 cases were enrolled. They were divided into HB and AR groups. The incidence of postoperative bleeding was 15% (3/20) in HB and 0% in AR (P = 0.199). The total number of postoperative bleeding events was five in HB and none in AR. The length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in AR than in HB (median: 3.0 vs. 13.5 days, < 0.001). There were no serious adverse events and no cerebral infarction/systemic embolism events.

Conclusion: AR for colorectal EMR may prove safe and has the potential to shorten hospital stay and reduce medical costs, though we were unable to evaluate the primary endpoint due to insufficient sample size.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9302298PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/deo2.102DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

postoperative bleeding
12
hospital stay
12
endoscopic mucosal
8
mucosal resection
8
patients warfarin
8
primary endpoint
8
incidence postoperative
8
length hospital
8
sample size
8
patients
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!