Methods: A total of 111 patients in total from different disease phases were recruited, including 21 in immune-tolerant (IT) phase, 49 in immune-clearance (IC) phases, 29 in immune-control or low replicative (LR) phase, and 12 in reactivation phases. Serum HBV RNA, anti-HBc, HBcrAg, and intrahepatic covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) were quantified and each of these indicator's correlation with liver inflammation was analyzed.
Results: HBeAg-positive individuals had significant higher serum levels of HBV RNA and HBcrAg than those who were HBeAg negative, similar to that of serum HBV DNA. Comparatively, HBV RNA ( =0.79, < 0.01) and HBcrAg ( =0.78, < 0.01) had almost same higher overall correlation with the cccDNA, as that of HBV DNA ( =0.81, < 0.01). Serum anti-HBc level ( = -0.52, < 0.05) is negatively correlated with cccDNA level at IT phase rather than the other three phases. When set the cutoff value at 4.00 log IU/mL, serum anti-HBc showed potential to indicate liver inflammation, with AUC as 0.79 and the specificities as 78.85% for HBeAg positive, and with AUC as 0.72 and the specificities as 62.16% for HBeAg-negative patients, respectively.
Conclusions: In treatment-naïve patients, levels of serological markers HBV RNA and HBcrAg could mirror intrahepatic cccDNA level, but were not superior to HBV DNA level. Serum anti-HBc level had certain potential to be used as a predicting marker for liver inflammation.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9303147 | PMC |
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/4133283 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Background: Due to the unique geographical and climatic conditions in Nagqu (Tibet), the blood station laboratory was only fully established and accredited by 2020. This study validated the performance of the laboratory's blood screening system and analyzed recent trends in blood donation and screening effectiveness.
Methods: Various serum samples were used to assess the performance of hepatitis B, hepatitis C, HIV, and syphilis tests, both serological and nucleic acid tests.
Newer Diagnostic Virological Markers for Hepatitis B Virus Infection.
Euroasian J Hepatogastroenterol
December 2024
Department of Clinical Virology, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Unlabelled: Chronic Hepatitis B (CHB) remains a major public health problem, leading to various complications such as liver fibrosis, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma. The existing diagnostic markers for Hepatitis B virus (HBV) are limited in distinguishing different CHB phases and intra-hepatic viral replication activity. In the past few years, several non-invasive potential blood markers that reflect viral intra-hepatic replicative state more accurately have been in progress and are gaining importance.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFSerum O-glycosylated HBsAg levels correlate with HBV RNA in HBeAg positive CHB patients during antiviral therapy.
Antiviral Res
January 2025
Department of Infectious Diseases, Research Laboratory of Clinical Virology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200025, China. Electronic address:
Background: Recent evidence has indicated that the O-glycosylated PreS2 domain of the middle HBsAg is a distinguishing characteristic that allows the identification of HBsAg of HBV Dane particles and SVPs. This study's objective was to assess the changes in serum O-glycosylated HBsAg levels in CHB patients undergoing ETV or Peg-IFNα treatment.
Methods: Our retrospective study enrolled 86 patients with genotype C CHB.
Prediction of cccDNA dynamics in hepatitis B patients by a combination of serum surrogate markers.
PLoS Comput Biol
January 2025
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Quantification of intrahepatic covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) is a key for evaluating an elimination of hepatitis B virus (HBV) in infected patients. However, quantifying cccDNA requires invasive methods such as a liver biopsy, which makes it impractical to access the dynamics of cccDNA in patients. Although HBV RNA and HBV core-related antigens (HBcrAg) have been proposed as surrogate markers for evaluating cccDNA activity, they do not necessarily estimate the amount of cccDNA.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFXalnesiran with or without an Immunomodulator in Chronic Hepatitis B.
N Engl J Med
December 2024
From the Department of Infectious Diseases and Hepatology Unit, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University (J.H., X.L.), and the State Key Laboratory of Organ Failure Research, Key Laboratory of Infectious Diseases Research in South China, Ministry of Education, Guangdong Institute of Hepatology, Nanfang Hospital (J.H.), Guangzhou, the Department of Infectious Diseases and Biosafety Emergency Response, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University (W.Z.), the Department of Infectious Diseases, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine (Q.X.), Roche Holding (Q.B., E.C.), Roche Research and Development Center (C.C., Y.H.), and Takeda APAC Biopharmaceutical Research and Development (Q.B.), Shanghai, the Department of Hepatology, Center of Infectious Diseases and Pathogen Biology, First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun (R.H.), the Center of Infectious Diseases, Laboratory of Infectious and Liver Disease, Institute of Infectious Diseases, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu (H.T.), and the Department of Medicine and State Key Laboratory of Liver Research, Queen Mary Hospital, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong (M.-F.Y.) - all in China; the Division of Infectious Diseases, University Hospital Álvaro Cunqueiro, Galicia Sur Health Research Institute, Servizo Galego de Saúde-Universidade de Vigo, Vigo, Spain (L.E.M.A.); the Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital (S.-S.Y.), and the Center for Digestive Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, China Medical University Hospital, China Medical University (C.-Y.P.), Taichung, the Department of Internal Medicine, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua (W.-W.S.), Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung (W.-L.C.), and National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei (J.-H.K.) - all in Taiwan; the Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym University College of Medicine, Chuncheon, South Korea (D.J.K.); the HIV Netherlands Australia Thailand Research Collaboration, Thai Red Cross AIDS Research Center and the Center of Excellence in Tuberculosis, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok (A.A.), and the Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai (A.L.) - both in Thailand; Université de Paris-Cité, Department of Hepatology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Beaujon, Centre de Recherche sur l'Inflammation, INSERM Unité Mixte de Recherche 1149, Paris (T.A.); F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Basel, Switzerland (F. Canducci, M.T.C., F. Chughlay, K.G., N.G., P.K., R.K., M.T.); Roche Products, Welwyn Garden City (S.D., V.P., B.S., R.U., C.W.), and ID Pharma Consultancy, Yelverton (C.W.) - both in the United Kingdom; Enthera Pharmaceuticals, Milan (F. Canducci); Parexel International, Hyderabad, India (A.P.); and the New Zealand Liver Transplant Unit, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand (E.G.).
Background: Xalnesiran, a small interfering RNA molecule that targets a conserved region of the hepatitis B virus (HBV) genome and silences multiple HBV transcripts, may have efficacy, with or without an immunomodulator, in patients with chronic HBV infection.
Methods: We conducted a phase 2, multicenter, randomized, controlled, adaptive, open-label platform trial that included the evaluation of 48 weeks of treatment with xalnesiran at a dose of 100 mg (group 1), xalnesiran at a dose of 200 mg (group 2), xalnesiran at a dose of 200 mg plus 150 mg of ruzotolimod (group 3), xalnesiran at a dose of 200 mg plus 180 μg of pegylated interferon alfa-2a (group 4), or a nucleoside or nucleotide analogue (NA) alone (group 5) in participants with chronic HBV infection who had virologic suppression with NA therapy. The primary efficacy end point was hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) loss (HBsAg level, <0.
Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!